» Articles » PMID: 39453599

Hypocalcemia Event Associated with Denosumab: A Real-World Study from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39453599
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Denosumab is widely used for osteoporosis and cancer treatment. However, hypocalcemia induced by denosumab is a frequent adverse event. The objective of this study is to comprehensively investigate the safety signals and the occurrence of hypocalcemia in real-world patient cases reported through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: Reports from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 were extracted from the FAERS. Only cases of hypocalcemia suspected to denosumab were eligible in pharmacovigilance study. Denosumab-related hypocalcemia safety signal were identified to characterize their clinical features. A safety signal for hypocalcemia was evaluated using reporting odds ratios (ROR).

Results: Among the 102,413 cases related to denosumab, 1042 cases were reported with denosumab-related hypocalcemia. The affected patients were mainly elderly (median age 70 years) and male (n = 568, 63.5%). In available data, the median onset time of 23 (range 0-1601) days. Most patients required drug interruption (n = 226, 72.9%) and can achieve a recovered-resolved state (n = 318, 62.1%). For the whole database, denosumab exhibited a safety signal for hypocalcemia (ROR = 14.09, 95% Cl 13.18, 15.06). In the sensitivity analyses, denosumab also showed a safety signal for hypocalcemia in cancer (ROR = 21.28, 95% Cl 18.79, 24.11) and osteoporosis (ROR = 9.29, 95% Cl 6.80, 12.59). Compared with bisphosphonates, denosumab still has safety signal for hypocalcemia (ROR = 1.88, 95% Cl 1.67, 2.11).

Conclusions: This pharmacovigilance database analysis indicates a high safety signal for hypocalcemia associated with denosumab, particularly in cancer patients.

References
1.
Baron R, Ferrari S, Russell R . Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone. 2010; 48(4):677-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020. View

2.
Montgomery C, Couch C, Emory C, Nicholas R . Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Review of Current Literature, Evaluation, and Treatment Options. J Knee Surg. 2018; 32(4):331-336. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675815. View

3.
Clezardin P, Coleman R, Puppo M, Ottewell P, Bonnelye E, Paycha F . Bone metastasis: mechanisms, therapies, and biomarkers. Physiol Rev. 2020; 101(3):797-855. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2019. View

4.
Reid I, Billington E . Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022; 399(10329):1080-1092. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02646-5. View

5.
Cooper M, Gittoes N . Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia. BMJ. 2008; 336(7656):1298-302. PMC: 2413335. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39582.589433.BE. View