Quantitative ROI Differences for Assessment of Occult Intertrochanteric Extension of Greater Trochanteric Fractures on Pelvis CT

Overview

Journal Emerg Radiol

Specialties Emergency Medicine
Radiology

Date 2024 Oct 25

PMID 39453407

Authors

Meghan A Moriarty

Dimitri G Stefanov

Michael S Brown

Daniel M Walz

Pamela J Walsh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if difference in Hounsfield Units (HU) of the medullary bone between the injured and non-injured femurs in patients with greater trochanteric fractures is associated with occult intertrochanteric (IT) extension.

Methods: Retrospective review was performed of 81 patients (age range 54-102, 54 females and 27 males) who underwent CT and subsequent MRI after identification of a greater trochanteric fracture without evidence of IT extension on radiography and/or CT. Hounsfield units of the injured and non-injured femurs on CT were recorded at the level of the base of the greater trochanter centrally (ROI1) and the level of the upper border of the lesser trochanter posteromedially (ROI2). The difference between the injured and non-injured femur for each ROI1 and ROI2 were calculated. Absence or presence, and if present, extent of IT extension was assessed on MRI. Analysis was performed to determine if there is correlation of difference in density with presence, and extent of occult IT fractures.

Results: 81 cases met inclusion criteria, 14 (17%) had no IT extension, 11 (14%) had less than 50% IT extension and 56 (69%) had 50% or greater IT extension. There was statistical significance between presence and absence of IT extension between the injured and non-injured femur for ROI1 (HU) no IT extension median (IQR): 18.8(4-40), ROI1 (HU) present IT extension median (IQR): 65.5(46-90) p < .0001, and for ROI2 no IT extension median (IQR): 3(-8-25.5) and ROI2 present IT extension 51(40.5-76), p < .0001. There was statistical significance of the extent of IT extension: ROI1 less than 50% IT extension median (IQR): 37.5(27.5-57), ROI1 50% or greater IT extension median (IQR): 72.3(53.5-91.3), p < .0001, and for ROI2 less than 50% IT extension median (IQR): 17.5(8-49), and ROI2 50% or greater IT extension median (IQR): 55.8(45.3-81.5), p < .0001. A threshold ROI2 difference of 50 HU resulted in specificity of 92% and sensitivity 60.7% of for IT extension 50% or greater.

Conclusion: Patients presenting with greater trochanteric fractures, an asymmetric increased density measured by ROI differences within the medullary space of the IT region between the injured and non-injured femur is associated with occult IT extension.

References

Orces C, Alamgir H . Trends in fall-related injuries among older adults treated in emergency departments in the USA. Inj Prev. 2014; 20(6):421-3. DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041268. View

Adeyemi A, Delhougne G . Incidence and Economic Burden of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Medicare Claims Database Analysis. JB JS Open Access. 2019; 4(1):e0045. PMC: 6510469. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00045. View

Alam A, Willett K, Ostlere S . The MRI diagnosis and management of incomplete intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(9):1253-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.16558. View

Kim S, Ahn J, Kim H, Kim J . Is magnetic resonance imaging necessary in isolated greater trochanter fracture? A systemic review and pooled analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:395. PMC: 4690329. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0857-y. View

Oc Y, Varol A, Yazar E, Ak S, Akpolat A, Kilinc B . Treatment strategy for elderly patients with the isolated greater trochanteric fracture. SAGE Open Med. 2020; 8:2050312120964138. PMC: 7550942. DOI: 10.1177/2050312120964138. View

Park J, Shon H, Chang J, Kim C, Byun S, Han B . How can MRI change the treatment strategy in apparently isolated greater trochanteric fracture?. Injury. 2018; 49(4):824-828. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.017. View

Schultz E, Miller T, Boruchov S, Schmell E, Toledano B . Incomplete intertrochanteric fractures: imaging features and clinical management. Radiology. 1999; 211(1):237-40. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99mr24237. View

Walsh P, Farooq M, Walz D . Occult fracture propagation in patients with isolated greater trochanteric fractures: patterns and management. Skeletal Radiol. 2021; 51(7):1391-1398. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03965-8. View

Collin D, Geijer M, Gothlin J . Computed tomography compared to magnetic resonance imaging in occult or suspect hip fractures. A retrospective study in 44 patients. Eur Radiol. 2016; 26(11):3932-3938. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4189-y. View

10.

Lee K, Kim H, Kim Y, Jeong C, Moon C, Lee S . Isolated fractures of the greater trochanter with occult intertrochanteric extension. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130(10):1275-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1120-5. View

11.

OConnor M, Switzer J . AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary: Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022; 30(20):e1291-e1296. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00125. View

12.

Sankey R, Turner J, Lee J, Healy J, Gibbons C . The use of MRI to detect occult fractures of the proximal femur: a study of 102 consecutive cases over a ten-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(8):1064-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.21959. View

13.

Khaliq A, Nsiah E, Bilal N, Hughes D, Duszak Jr R . The scope and distribution of imaging services at critical access hospitals. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11(9):857-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.013. View

14.

Davidson A, Silver N, Cohen D, Gross M, Zinger G, Applbaum Y . Justifying CT prior to MRI in cases of suspected occult hip fracture. A proposed diagnostic protocol. Injury. 2020; 52(6):1429-1433. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.063. View

15.

Hakkarinen D, Banh K, Hendey G . Magnetic resonance imaging identifies occult hip fractures missed by 64-slice computed tomography. J Emerg Med. 2012; 43(2):303-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.037. View

16.

Haubro M, Stougaard C, Torfing T, Overgaard S . Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur. Injury. 2015; 46(8):1557-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.006. View

17.

Lubovsky O, Liebergall M, Mattan Y, Weil Y, Mosheiff R . Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures MRI versus CT scan. Injury. 2005; 36(6):788-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.01.024. View

18.

Geijer M, Dunker D, Collin D, Gothlin J . Bone bruise, lipohemarthrosis, and joint effusion in CT of non-displaced hip fracture. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53(2):197-202. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.110466. View

19.

Khurana B, Okanobo H, Ossiani M, Ledbetter S, Al Dulaimy K, Sodickson A . Abbreviated MRI for patients presenting to the emergency department with hip pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(6):W581-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7258. View

20.

Ross A, Chan B, Yi P, Repplinger M, Vanness D, Lee K . Diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MRI protocol for detecting radiographically occult hip and pelvis fractures in the elderly. Skeletal Radiol. 2018; 48(1):103-108. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-018-3004-7. View