» Articles » PMID: 39453089

Balance Assessment on a Modified Posturomed Platform in Healthy Dogs

Overview
Journal Vet Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39453089
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reliable, standardized balance tests for dogs are not available yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of static and dynamic posturography in healthy dogs. Healthy dogs ( = 20) were positioned with four paws longitudinally and with the forepaws only transversely on a modified pressure-sensitive balance platform (Posturomed-FDM-JS, Zebris, Isny, Germany). Three static and dynamic posturographic trials were recorded (recording duration: 20 s) and repeated after 7-14 days. Center of pressure (COP) parameters COP-path-length (PL; mm), 95% COP-confidence-ellipse-area (CEA; mm), and COP-average-velocity (AV; mm/s) were calculated for the first steady-state 5 s intervals of each trial. The reliability of COP parameters was assessed with robust linear mixed effects models with nested random effects of patient and trial. The training effect was analyzed using Cohen's d. For static posturography, PL, CEA, and AV did not differ significantly between time points; CEA had the highest reliability ( = 0.92). For dynamic posturography, AV and PL differed significantly between time points (AV: ≤ 0.043; PL: ≤ 0.045). Slight training effects were observed for transverse positioning (Cohen's d: PL 0.65; AV 0.267) and moderate training effects for longitudinal positioning (Cohen's d: PL: 0.772; AV: 0.783). This study showed that static posturography on a modified Posturomed-balance platform was reliable in healthy dogs but indicated training effects during dynamic posturography.

References
1.
Lewis M, Williams K, Langley T, Jarvis L, Sawicki G, Olby N . Development of a Novel Gait Analysis Tool Measuring Center of Pressure for Evaluation of Canine Chronic Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019; 36(21):3018-3025. PMC: 6791469. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6479. View

2.
Farr B, Gabrysiak J, Traylor R, Zayas S, Ramos M, Mallikarjun A . Functional measurement of canine muscular fitness: refinement and reliability of the Penn Vet Working Dog Center Sprint Test. Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1217201. PMC: 10350527. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1217201. View

3.
Park D, Lee G . Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11:99. PMC: 4074461. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-99. View

4.
Bostrom A, Hyytiainen H, Koho P, Cizinauskas S, Hielm-Bjorkman A . Development of the Finnish neurological function testing battery for dogs and its intra- and inter-rater reliability. Acta Vet Scand. 2018; 60(1):56. PMC: 6142623. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-018-0408-2. View

5.
Pavol M . Detecting and understanding differences in postural sway. Focus on "A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control". J Neurophysiol. 2004; 93(1):20-1. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00864.2004. View