» Articles » PMID: 39450119

Insights from Expert Coaches on Technical Performance Evaluation in Rowing: a Pilot Study

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39450119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Since rowing became an Olympic sport in 1900, rowers have made significant performance gains, partly attributed to increased research, training, and competition knowledge. Rowing technique and biomechanics play an essential role in rowing performance. While some aspects can be quantified with modern tools, coaches' expertise remains essential for technical performance evaluation. Coaches often play a pivotal role in identifying and correcting technical faws; however, novice and intermediate coaches may struggle. This study examines how expert-level rowing coaches assess the technical performance of athletes during on-water rowing.

Methods: Four current and former national team coaches were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. The repertory grid technique was employed to explore their initial foci when assessing the rowing technique. The acquired data were content-analysed and listed in a summarising table.

Results: We have detailed both the positive and negative aspects of rowing technique identified by these coaches. Three overarching themes were identified: .

Discussion: Examining the categories revealed that the coaches with a shared federation background exhibited a relatively high level of similarity in their initial foci. However, looking into their subjective aspects revealed considerable differences. This leads to the hypothesis that a broad spectrum of unique coaches' criteria can lead to the same or similar technique executions from their athletes.

References
1.
Smith T, Hopkins W . Measures of rowing performance. Sports Med. 2012; 42(4):343-58. DOI: 10.2165/11597230-000000000-00000. View

2.
Legge N, Watsford M, Sharp P, OMeara D, Slattery K . "A feeling for run and rhythm": coaches' perspectives of performance, talent, and progression in rowing. J Sports Sci. 2023; 41(10):927-936. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2023.2249752. View

3.
Soper C, Hume P . Towards an ideal rowing technique for performance : the contributions from biomechanics. Sports Med. 2004; 34(12):825-48. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200434120-00003. View

4.
Mikulic P, Smoljanovic T, Bojanic I, Hannafin J, Matkovic B . Relationship between 2000-m rowing ergometer performance times and World Rowing Championships rankings in elite-standard rowers. J Sports Sci. 2009; 27(9):907-13. DOI: 10.1080/02640410902911950. View

5.
Smith R, Loschner C . Biomechanics feedback for rowing. J Sports Sci. 2002; 20(10):783-91. DOI: 10.1080/026404102320675639. View