» Articles » PMID: 39450100

Incidence and Variability in Receipt of Phenotype-desirable Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections Among Hospitalized United States Patients

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Using a large, geographically diverse, hospital-based database in the United States (Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database), we aimed to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients receiving phenotype-desirable antimicrobial therapy (PDAT) among those hospitalized with Enterobacterales bloodstream infections.

Methods: Adult patients with an admission between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2022 with ≥1 blood culture positive for , , , or and receiving an empiric antibiotic therapy on blood culture collection (BCC) Days 0 or 1 were included. Receiving PDAT (defined as receipt of any antimicrobial categorized as "desirable" for the respective phenotype) on BCC Days 0-2 was defined as receiving early PDAT.

Results: Among 35,880 eligible patients, the proportion of patients receiving PDAT increased (from 6.8% to 22.8%) from BCC Day 0-4. Patients who received PDAT (8,193, 22.8%) were more likely to visit large (500 + beds, 36% vs 31%), teaching (45% vs 39%), and urban (85% vs 82%) hospitals in the Northeast (22% vs 13%) compared to patients not receiving PDAT (all <. 01). Among patients receiving PDAT, 61.4% (n = 5,033) received it early; they had a lower mean comorbidity score (3.2 vs 3.6), were less likely to have severe or extreme severity of illness (71% vs 79%), and were less likely to have a pathogen susceptible to narrow-spectrum β-lactams (31% vs 71%) compared to patients in the delayed PDAT group (all < .01).

Conclusions: The proportion of patients receiving desirable therapy increased between BCC Day 0 and 4. Receipts of PDAT and early PDAT were associated with hospital, clinical, and pathogen characteristics.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Early Phenotype-Desirable Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterobacterales Bacteremia.

Moon R, MacVane S, David J, Morton J, Rosenthal N, Claeys K JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(12):e2451633.

PMID: 39714841 PMC: 11667351. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51633.

References
1.
Romano P, Chan B . Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool?. Health Serv Res. 2000; 34(7):1469-89. PMC: 1975668. View

2.
Fuhrmeister A, Jones R . The Importance of Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Worldwide and the Origins of SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019; 6(Suppl 1):S1-S4. PMC: 6419910. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy346. View

3.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007; 370(9596):1453-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. View

4.
Albrich W, Monnet D, Harbarth S . Antibiotic selection pressure and resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10(3):514-7. PMC: 3322805. DOI: 10.3201/eid1003.030252. View

5.
Seddon M, Bookstaver P, Justo J, Kohn J, Rac H, Haggard E . Role of Early De-escalation of Antimicrobial Therapy on Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection Following Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 69(3):414-420. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy863. View