» Articles » PMID: 39449710

Shoulder-assist Exoskeleton Effects on Balance and Muscle Activity During a Block-laying Task on a Simulated Mast Climber

Overview
Journal Int J Ind Ergon
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39449710
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interest in utilizing exoskeletons to mitigate the risks of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among construction workers is growing, spurred by encouraging results in other industries. However, it is crucial to carefully examine their impact on workers' stability and balance before implementation. In this study, seven male participants lifted a 35-lb cinder block from a production table to a simulated wall at two heights-elbow and shoulder levels-using three different exoskeleton models on an unstable platform, where their balance and shoulder muscle activity were assessed. Balance-related parameters, included mean distance (MDIST), total excursion (EXCUR), and mean velocity (VEL) of the center of pressure, were derived from force plate data. Muscle activity in six shoulder and upper arm muscles was estimated using electromyography (EMG) data. The results indicated that wearing two of the exoskeletons significantly increased both total and medio-lateral (ML) MDIST compared to not wearing an exoskeleton. Wearing one of the exoskeletons significantly increased total and ML VEL and ML EXCUR. Although lifting level did not have a significant impact on the balance parameters, it did affect the muscle activity in most of the measured muscles. Moreover, only one exoskeleton significantly reduced the activity in a particular shoulder muscle compared to no exoskeleton use. In conclusion, the evaluated shoulder-assist exoskeletons showed limited benefits for preventing upper extremity MSDs and may negatively affect whole-body balance during a block-laying task on an unstable platform. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive evaluations of balance and effectiveness prior to adopting exoskeletons in construction.

References
1.
Watterworth M, Dharmaputra R, Porto R, Cort J, La Delfa N . Equations for estimating the static supportive torque provided by upper-limb exoskeletons. Appl Ergon. 2023; 113:104092. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104092. View

2.
Brandt M, Blafoss R, Jakobsen M, Samani A, Ajslev J, Madeleine P . Influence of brick laying height on biomechanical load in masons: Cross-sectional field study with technical measurements. Work. 2024; 79(1):459-470. PMC: 11492044. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230325. View

3.
Suydam S, Manal K, Buchanan T . The Advantages of Normalizing Electromyography to Ballistic Rather than Isometric or Isokinetic Tasks. J Appl Biomech. 2016; 33(3):189-196. DOI: 10.1123/jab.2016-0146. View

4.
Pan C, Powers J, Hartsell J, Harris J, Wimer B, Dong R . Assessment of fall-arrest systems for scissor lift operators: computer modeling and manikin drop testing. Hum Factors. 2012; 54(3):358-72. DOI: 10.1177/0018720811425024. View

5.
Melzer I, Benjuya N, Kaplanski J . Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers. Age Ageing. 2004; 33(6):602-7. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh218. View