» Articles » PMID: 39448952

Silver Nanoparticles Versus Chitosan Nanoparticles Effects on Demineralized Enamel

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39448952
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To compare the impacts of different remineralizing agents on demineralized enamel, we focused on chitosan nanoparticles (ChiNPs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs).

Methods: This study was conducted on 40 extracted human premolars with artificially induced demineralization using demineralizing solution. Prior to the beginning of the experimental procedures, the samples were preserved in artificial saliva solution. The nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and teeth were divided into four equal groups: Group A was utilized as a control group (no demineralization) and received no treatment. Group B was subjected to demineralization with no treatment. Group C was subjected to demineralization and then treated with ChiNPs. Group D was subjected to demineralization and then treated with AgNPs. The teeth were evaluated for microhardness. The enamel surfaces of all the samples were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphological changes and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) for elemental analysis.

Results: The third and fourth groups had the highest mean microhardness and calcium (Ca) and phosphorous (P) contents. SEM of these two groups revealed relative restoration of homogenous remineralized enamel surface architecture with minimal micropores.

Conclusion: Chitosan nanoparticles (NPs) and silver NPs help restore the enamel surface architecture and mineral content. Therefore, chitosan NPs and AgNPs would be beneficial for remineralizing enamel.

References
1.
Amaechi B, AbdulAzees P, Alshareif D, Shehata M, Lima P, Abdollahi A . Comparative efficacy of a hydroxyapatite and a fluoride toothpaste for prevention and remineralization of dental caries in children. BDJ Open. 2019; 5:18. PMC: 6901576. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-019-0026-8. View

2.
Freire P, Albuquerque A, Farias I, da Silva T, Aguiar J, Galembeck A . Antimicrobial and cytotoxicity evaluation of colloidal chitosan - silver nanoparticles - fluoride nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016; 93(Pt A):896-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.052. View

3.
Li D, Fu D, Kang H, Rong G, Jin Z, Wang X . Advances and Potential Applications of Chitosan Nanoparticles as a Delivery Carrier for the Mucosal Immunity of Vaccine. Curr Drug Deliv. 2016; 14(1):27-35. DOI: 10.2174/1567201813666160804121123. View

4.
Khare K, Bhusari P, Soni A, Malagi S, Abraham D, Johnson L . A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2023; 11(1):41-46. PMC: 10153734. DOI: 10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20. View

5.
Scarpelli B, Punhagui M, Hoeppner M, Almeida R, Juliani F, Guiraldo R . In Vitro Evaluation of the Remineralizing Potential and Antimicrobial Activity of a Cariostatic Agent with Silver Nanoparticles. Braz Dent J. 2017; 28(6):738-743. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201701365. View