Segmentation Window of Speech Information Processing in the Human Auditory Cortex

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Oct 25

PMID 39448758

Authors

Minoru Hayashi

Tetsuo Kida

Koji Inui

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Humans perceive continuous speech signals as discrete sequences. To clarify the temporal segmentation window of speech information processing in the human auditory cortex, the relationship between speech perception and cortical responses was investigated using auditory evoked magnetic fields (AEFs). AEFs were measured while participants heard synthetic Japanese words /atataka/. There were eight types of /atataka/ with different speech rates. The durations of the words ranged from 75 to 600 ms. The results revealed a clear correlation between the AEFs and syllables. Specifically, when the durations of the words were between 375 and 600 ms, the evoked responses exhibited four clear responses from the superior temporal area, M100, that corresponded not only to the onset of speech but also to each group of consonant/vowel syllable units. The number of evoked M100 responses was correlated to the duration of the stimulus as well as the number of perceived syllables. The approximate range of the temporal segmentation window limit of speech perception was considered to be between 75 and 94 ms. This finding may contribute to optimizing the temporal performance of high-speed synthesized speech generation systems.

References

Buzsaki G . Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(5):446-51. DOI: 10.1038/nn1233. View

Cynx J . Experimental determination of a unit of song production in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J Comp Psychol. 1990; 104(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.3. View

Teng X, Tian X, Poeppel D . Testing multi-scale processing in the auditory system. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34390. PMC: 5054370. DOI: 10.1038/srep34390. View

Port R, Dalby J, Odell M . Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987; 81(5):1574-85. DOI: 10.1121/1.394510. View

de Vries I, Marinato G, Baldauf D . Decoding Object-Based Auditory Attention from Source-Reconstructed MEG Alpha Oscillations. J Neurosci. 2021; 41(41):8603-8617. PMC: 8513695. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0583-21.2021. View

Kaukoranta E, Hari R, Lounasmaa O . Responses of the human auditory cortex to vowel onset after fricative consonants. Exp Brain Res. 1987; 69(1):19-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247025. View

Maruyama S, Fukunaga M, Fautz H, Heidemann R, Sadato N . Comparison of 3T and 7T MRI for the visualization of globus pallidus sub-segments. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18357. PMC: 6892946. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54880-x. View

Patel A, Balaban E . Temporal patterns of human cortical activity reflect tone sequence structure. Nature. 2000; 404(6773):80-4. DOI: 10.1038/35003577. View

Barton B, Venezia J, Saberi K, Hickok G, Brewer A . Orthogonal acoustic dimensions define auditory field maps in human cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(50):20738-43. PMC: 3528571. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213381109. View

10.

Chalas N, Daube C, Kluger D, Abbasi O, Nitsch R, Gross J . Multivariate analysis of speech envelope tracking reveals coupling beyond auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 2022; 258:119395. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119395. View

11.

Ozker M, Yoshor D, Beauchamp M . Converging Evidence From Electrocorticography and BOLD fMRI for a Sharp Functional Boundary in Superior Temporal Gyrus Related to Multisensory Speech Processing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:141. PMC: 5928751. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00141. View

12.

Giraud A, Kleinschmidt A, Poeppel D, Lund T, Frackowiak R, Laufs H . Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron. 2007; 56(6):1127-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.038. View

13.

Teng X, Tian X, Doelling K, Poeppel D . Theta band oscillations reflect more than entrainment: behavioral and neural evidence demonstrates an active chunking process. Eur J Neurosci. 2017; 48(8):2770-2782. PMC: 5904023. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13742. View

14.

Cohen D . Magnetoencephalography: evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha-rhythm currents. Science. 1968; 161(3843):784-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.161.3843.784. View

15.

Zhang N, Zhang Q . Rhythmic pattern facilitates speech production: An ERP study. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):12974. PMC: 6736834. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49375-8. View

16.

Peelle J, Davis M . Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:320. PMC: 3434440. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00320. View

17.

Inui K, Urakawa T, Yamashiro K, Otsuru N, Nishihara M, Takeshima Y . Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans. BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11:80. PMC: 2904354. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-80. View

18.

Mitsudo T, Hironaga N, Mori S . Cortical activity associated with the detection of temporal gaps in tones: a magnetoencephalography study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:763. PMC: 4191557. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00763. View

19.

Teng X, Tian X, Rowland J, Poeppel D . Concurrent temporal channels for auditory processing: Oscillatory neural entrainment reveals segregation of function at different scales. PLoS Biol. 2017; 15(11):e2000812. PMC: 5667736. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000812. View

20.

Giraud A, Poeppel D . Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15(4):511-7. PMC: 4461038. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3063. View