» Articles » PMID: 39448217

Effect of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen on Mortality in Patients with Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure: Protocol for a Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial (SOHO)

Abstract

Introduction: First-line oxygenation strategy in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure consists in standard oxygen or high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. Clinical practice guidelines suggest the use of high-flow nasal oxygen rather than standard oxygen. However, findings remain contradictory with a low level of certainty. We hypothesise that compared with standard oxygen, high-flow nasal oxygen may reduce mortality in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Method And Analysis: The Standard Oxygen versus High-flow nasal Oxygen-trial is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing high-flow nasal oxygen versus standard oxygen in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure with moderate-to-severe hypoxaemia. 1110 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups with a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome is the number of patients who died 28 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include comfort, dyspnoea and oxygenation 1 hour after treatment initiation, the number of patients intubated at day 28, mortality in ICU, in hospital and until day 90, and complications during ICU stay.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study has been approved by the central Ethics Committee 'Sud Méditerranée III' (2020-07-05) and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial Registration Number: NCT04468126.

References
1.
Delclaux C, LHer E, Alberti C, Mancebo J, Abroug F, Conti G . Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000; 284(18):2352-60. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.18.2352. View

2.
Moller W, Celik G, Feng S, Bartenstein P, Meyer G, Oliver E . Nasal high flow clears anatomical dead space in upper airway models. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015; 118(12):1525-32. PMC: 4482836. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00934.2014. View

3.
Sim M, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M . Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63(9):938-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. View

4.
Coudroy R, Frat J, Ehrmann S, Pene F, Decavele M, Terzi N . High-flow nasal oxygen alone or alternating with non-invasive ventilation in critically ill immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022; 10(7):641-649. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00096-0. View

5.
Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta C, Bellani G . Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 195(9):1207-1215. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC. View