» Articles » PMID: 39444972

Mortality Salience and Helping Behavior Amidst Public Crisis: Cross-sectional Evidence During COVID-19

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39444972
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As a real mortality salience, a public crisis would have a major impact on individual minds, behaviors, and lifestyles. COVID-19 provides us with a stark real-world example to understand these implications. Previous research has revealed that some individuals become more willing to help the infected at the risk of their own lives, while others become more self-centered and indifferent during COVID-19. To explain this paradoxical phenomenon, our study used two rival mediators in the relationship between mortality salience and helping behavior during COVID-19: death anxiety and death reflection.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Chinese college students (N = 684) during the pandemic. We used a parallel mediation model to explore the mediating roles of death anxiety and death reflection in the relationship between mortality salience and helping behavior during COVID-19.

Results: The results of our study indicate two key findings. First, mortality salience is negatively related to helping behavior during COVID-19 via death anxiety. This suggests that individuals with higher levels of mortality salience experienced increased death anxiety, which in turn led to a decrease in helping behavior. Second, mortality salience is positively related to helping behavior during COVID-19 via death reflection. This indicates that individuals with higher levels of mortality salience engaged in deeper reflection on death, which subsequently resulted in an increase in helping behavior.

Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between mortality salience and helping behaviors in the time of public crisis, and can help lead to more positive attitudes toward public crisis events such as COVID-19.

References
1.
Templer D . The construction and validation of a Death Anxiety Scale. J Gen Psychol. 1970; 82(2d Half):165-77. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1970.9920634. View

2.
Jin S, Ryu E . "The greedy I that gives"-The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. J Consum Aff. 2021; 56(1):414-448. PMC: 8242723. DOI: 10.1111/joca.12381. View

3.
Zhong R, Paluch R, Shum V, Zatzick C, Robinson S . Hot, cold, or both? A person-centered perspective on death awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Appl Psychol. 2021; 106(6):839-855. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000931. View

4.
Hirschberger G, Florian V, Mikulincer M, Goldenberg J, Pyszczynski T . Gender differences in the willingness to engage in risky behavior: a terror management perspective. Death Stud. 2002; 26(2):117-41. DOI: 10.1080/074811802753455244. View

5.
Mejia M, Hyman S, Behbahani S, Farrell-Turner K . Death anxiety and ageist attitudes are related to trainees' interest in working with older adults. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2016; 39(3):341-356. DOI: 10.1080/02701960.2016.1247063. View