» Articles » PMID: 39444595

Computed Tomography-current Status and Future Directions for Arthritis Imaging

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39444595
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Applications of computed tomography (CT) in arthritis imaging have rapidly expanded in recent years due to ongoing technical developments. Dual-energy CT (DECT) has become indispensable in clinical practice, particularly for diagnosing gouty arthritis and assessing bony structural changes. Technological innovations such as low-dose CT and state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms reduce radiation exposure while maintaining image quality and short acquisition times. This review explores the growing role of CT in arthritis imaging. Recent innovations have extended DECT's utility beyond gout diagnosis to the detection of inflammatory changes in various arthritic conditions. Postprocessing techniques such as the generation of subtraction images and iodine maps provide valuable insights into tissue perfusion and inflammatory activity, crucial for arthritis management. DECT can distinguish calcium from uric acid crystals, facilitating the differential diagnosis of various crystal arthropathies in a variety of clinical settings. This ability is particularly valuable in distinguishing between different clinical conditions in patients with inflammatory joint changes within a single imaging examination. Moreover, the advent of four-dimensional CT promises a better assessment of dynamic joint instabilities and ligament injuries, especially in the wrist. Overall, DECT offers a comprehensive approach to arthritis imaging, from the detection of structural changes to the assessment of active inflammation in joints and tendons. Continuous advances in CT technology, including photon-counting CT, hold promise for further improving diagnostic accuracy and expanding the role of CT in arthritis imaging and therapy monitoring.

References
1.
Hesse N, Schmitt R, Luitjens J, Grunz J, Haas-Lutzenberger E . Carpal Instability: II. Imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021; 25(2):304-310. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730398. View

2.
Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castaneda J . 2018 updated European League Against Rheumatism evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 79(1):31-38. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215315. View

3.
Drosos A, Pelechas E, Voulgari P . Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis. What a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings. Rheumatol Int. 2019; 39(8):1331-1341. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-019-04326-4. View

4.
Ulas S, Diekhoff T, Hermann K, Poddubnyy D, Hamm B, Makowski M . Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging to improve the specificity of erosion detection: a prospective feasibility study in hand arthritis. Skeletal Radiol. 2018; 48(5):721-728. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-018-3116-0. View

5.
Rajendran K, Murthy N, Frick M, Tao S, Unger M, LaVallee K . Quantitative Knee Arthrography in a Large Animal Model of Osteoarthritis Using Photon-Counting Detector CT. Invest Radiol. 2020; 55(6):349-356. PMC: 7212750. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000648. View