» Articles » PMID: 39444493

Basketball Self-evaluation Matrix: Discrepancy Between Self-confidence and Decision-making Performance on Psychological Profiling of Players

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39444493
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In basketball training, self-evaluation plays a crucial role in the decision-making and execution of movements of players. The self-evaluation of players is influenced by their perception of own basketball ability and self-confidence state. This study aimed to explore potential discrepancies between self-confidence levels of players and their decision-making performance, while also characterizing different types of players.

Method: Data was collected from 20 youth basketball players who participated in a decision-making video task and a self-confidence assessment. Based on data from their self-confidence and decision-making awareness assessment, the K-means cluster analysis was used to categorize the players into different groups. Then, ANOVA and Scheffe test were conducted to compare these clusters.

Results: The cluster analysis identified four distinct profiles of players and the results of the ANOVA and Scheffe tests revealed significant differences between the four clusters. The "High Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness" players might display an overconfident mindset, while the "High Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness" players potentially demonstrated the better performance and maintained a consistent and confident attitude. The "Low Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness" players appeared to lack confidence and needed to foster greater faith in their abilities. Finally, the "Low Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness" players required a long-term and comprehensive training program to improve their skills.

Discussion: These preliminary findings informed the development of a self-evaluation matrix, designed to help coaches better understand player profiles and design tailored interventions. Moreover, this study contributes on sport calibration and enhances understanding of the behavioral and psychological states of players.

References
1.
Sansone P, Tessitore A, Lukonaitiene I, Paulauskas H, Tschan H, Conte D . Technical-tactical profile, perceived exertion, mental demands and enjoyment of different tactical tasks and training regimes in basketball small-sided games. Biol Sport. 2020; 37(1):15-23. PMC: 7075224. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.89937. View

2.
Lopez-Aguilar J, Burgueno R, Castillo-Rodriguez A, Onetti-Onetti W . Analyzing the relationship between self-efficacy and impulsivity in amateur soccer referees. PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13058. PMC: 8900613. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13058. View

3.
Page C, Bernier P, Trempe M . Using video simulations and virtual reality to improve decision-making skills in basketball. J Sports Sci. 2019; 37(21):2403-2410. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1638193. View

4.
Moore M, Reynolds J, Durand J, Trainor K, Caravaglia G . Mental Health Literacy of Australian Youth Sport Coaches. Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:871212. PMC: 9039291. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.871212. View

5.
Ashford M, Abraham A, Poolton J . Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence. Sports (Basel). 2021; 9(5). PMC: 8156213. DOI: 10.3390/sports9050065. View