» Articles » PMID: 39443535

Automated Deep Learning-based Bone Mineral Density Assessment for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening Using Various CT Protocols with Multi-vendor Scanners

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39443535
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This retrospective study examined the diagnostic efficacy of automated deep learning-based bone mineral density (DL-BMD) measurements for osteoporosis screening using 422 CT datasets from four vendors in two medical centers, encompassing 159 chest, 156 abdominal, and 107 lumbar spine datasets. DL-BMD values on L1 and L2 vertebral bodies were compared with manual BMD (m-BMD) measurements using Pearson's correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients. Strong agreement was found between m-BMD and DL-BMD in total CT scans (r = 0.953, p < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of DL-BMD was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis for osteoporosis and low BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and m-BMD. Compared to DXA, DL-BMD demonstrated an AUC of 0.790 (95% CI 0.733-0.839) for low BMD and 0.769 (95% CI 0.710-0.820) for osteoporosis, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 80.8% (95% CI 74.2-86.3%), 56.3% (95% CI 43.4-68.6%), and 74.3% (95% CI 68.3-79.7%) for low BMD and 65.4% (95% CI 50.9-78.0%), 70.9% (95% CI 63.8-77.3%), and 69.7% (95% CI 63.5-75.4%) for osteoporosis, respectively. Compared to m-BMD, DL-BMD showed an AUC of 0.983 (95% CI 0.973-0.993) for low BMD and 0.972 (95% CI 0.958-0.987) for osteoporosis, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.3% (95% CI 94.5-98.9%), 85.2% (95% CI 78.8-90.3%), and 92.7% (95% CI 89.7-95.0%) for low BMD and 94.4% (95% CI 88.3-97.9%), 89.5% (95% CI 85.6-92.7%), and 90.8% (95% CI 87.6-93.4%) for osteoporosis, respectively. The DL-based method can provide accurate and reliable BMD assessments across diverse CT protocols and scanners.

References
1.
Li Y, Jiang Y, Yu X, Ren B, Wang C, Chen S . Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:884306. PMC: 9403270. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.884306. View

2.
Oh S, Kang W, Park H, Yang Z, Lee J, Kim C . Evaluation of deep learning-based quantitative computed tomography for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):363. PMC: 10770031. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45824-7. View

3.
Sirinukunwattana K, Raza S, Tsang Y, Snead D, Cree I, Rajpoot N . Locality Sensitive Deep Learning for Detection and Classification of Nuclei in Routine Colon Cancer Histology Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 35(5):1196-1206. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2525803. View

4.
Jain R, Vokes T . Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom. 2017; 20(3):291-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.014. View

5.
Toussaint N, Lau K, Strauss B, Polkinghorne K, Kerr P . Determination and validation of aortic calcification measurement from lateral bone densitometry in dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 4(1):119-27. PMC: 2615701. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03410708. View