The Effect of Sequential Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview

Journal Arch Gynecol Obstet

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Oct 23

PMID 39443375

Authors

Saeed Baradwan

Majed Saeed Alshahrani

Hussein Sabban

Nabigah Alzawawi

Hanin Hassan Abduljabbar

Afnan Baradwan

Mohamed Anwar Haroun

Ahmed Alanwar

Mohamed Ali Mohamed

Yousef Mohamed El-Mazzally

Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhakim

Yasser Khamis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the impact of sequential embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across various databases for eligible clinical trials from inception to January 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared sequential embryo transfer, comprising both cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos, with other transfer protocols in infertile women with repeated implantation failure. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman software. Our primary focus was on the ongoing pregnancy rate. Our secondary measures included rates of chemical pregnancies, clinical pregnancies, miscarriages, and multiple pregnancies.

Results: Seven RCTs, encompassing 909 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Sequential embryo transfer demonstrated a significant increase in the ongoing pregnancy rate compared to the control group (OR = 2.28, 95% CI [1.46, 3.56], p = 0.003). Moreover, the sequential embryo transfer group exhibited notable improvements in chemical and clinical pregnancy rates. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding multiple pregnancy and miscarriage rates (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Sequential embryo transfer shows promise in enhancing pregnancy outcomes among RIF patients. However, additional trials are warranted to validate our findings.

References

Bar G, Harlev A, Alfayumi-Zeadna S, Zeadna A, Bord I, Har-Vardi I . Recurrent implantation failure: which patients benefit from endometrial scratching prior to IVF?. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301(3):817-822. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05424-1. View

Simon A, Laufer N . Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(5):1039-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010. View

Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L, Vegetti W, Somigliana E, Vercellini P . How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 40(1):91-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.014. View

Cakiroglu Y, Tiras B . Determining diagnostic criteria and cause of recurrent implantation failure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 32(3):198-204. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000620. View

Wu Y, Li L, Liu L, Yang X, Yan P, Yang K . Autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells intrauterine instillation to improve pregnancy outcomes after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 300(5):1445-1459. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05275-w. View

Zeng H, Hu L, Xie H, Ma W, Quan S . Polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor and recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021; 304(2):297-307. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06072-0. View

Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T . Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 28(1):14-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011. View

Enciso M, Aizpurua J, Rodriguez-Estrada B, Jurado I, Ferrandez-Rives M, Rodriguez E . The precise determination of the window of implantation significantly improves ART outcomes. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):13420. PMC: 8238935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92955-w. View

Sotiroska V, Petanovski Z, Dimitrov G, Hadji-Lega M, Shushleski D, Saltirovski S . The day of embryo transfer affects delivery rate, birth weights, female-to-male ratio, and monozygotic twin rate. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 54(6):716-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.06.011. View

10.

White C, Denomme M, Tekpetey F, Feyles V, Power S, Mann M . High Frequency of Imprinted Methylation Errors in Human Preimplantation Embryos. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:17311. PMC: 4667293. DOI: 10.1038/srep17311. View

11.

Zhang J, Wang C, Zhang H, Zhou Y . Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):142. PMC: 8439041. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00824-y. View

12.

Li J, Ji J, Guo H, Wang F, Fu Y, Hu R . Stratified analysis of clinical pregnancy outcomes of sequential embryo transfer in frozen embryo transfer cycles based on different factors: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):806. PMC: 10664651. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06111-5. View

13.

Goto S, Shiotani M, Kitagawa M, Kadowaki T, Noda Y . Effectiveness of two-step (consecutive) embryo transfer in patients who have two embryos on day 2: comparison with cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(3):721-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.974. View

14.

Salehpour S, Hosseini S, Razghandi Z, Hosseinirad H, Ziaee H . Comparing the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: A randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 62(2):264-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.10.009. View

15.

Tehraninejad E, Raisi E, Ghaleh F, Hossein Rashidi B, Aziminekoo E, Kalantari V . The sequential embryo transfer compared to blastocyst embryo transfer in fertilization (IVF) cycle in patients with the three repeated consecutive IVF. A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019; 35(11):955-959. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1613639. View

16.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9, W64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. View

17.

Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt G, Henry D, Hill S . Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004; 4(1):38. PMC: 545647. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38. View

18.

Ji M, Zhang L, Fu X, Xie W, Wu X, Shu J . The outcomes of sequential embryo transfer in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed embryos: A retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022; 48(10):2563-2570. DOI: 10.1111/jog.15369. View

19.

Li Y, Zhang L, Yu P, Cai X, Li N, Ma B . The efficacy of sequential day 3 embryo and blastocyst transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023; 283:32-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.005. View

20.

Stamenov G, Parvanov D, Chaushev T . Successful Pregnancy following Mixed Double Embryo Transfer in a Patient with Variable Window of Implantation. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 2018:1687583. PMC: 5960520. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1687583. View