» Articles » PMID: 39443366

Evaluating the Impact of Loperamide on Irinotecan-induced Adverse Events: a Disproportionality Analysis of Data from the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase)

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Oct 23
PMID 39443366
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, may cause adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation and management. Diarrhea, which is treated with loperamide, is one such event. However, loperamide may delay SN-38 elimination, causing more adverse events. Therefore, understanding the adverse events caused by symptomatic drugs is crucial for safe drug therapy. This study aimed to assess the association between loperamide and irinotecan-induced adverse events.

Methods: We analyzed data up to December 2022 from VigiBase, the World Health Organization's adverse event database. The study used reporting odds ratios (RORs) to evaluate the associations between concomitant medications and irinotecan-induced adverse events. Fisher's exact probability test was used to analyze the adverse events. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated adverse event signals.

Results: Of the 32,520,983 cases analyzed, 57,454 involved the use of irinotecan. Among these, 1589 (2.8%) patients were co-treated with loperamide. Signals for neutropenia (ROR 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.57, p < 0.001), anemia (ROR 1.81, 95% CI 1.43-2.30, p < 0.001), and alopecia (ROR 1.89, 95% CI 1.30-2.74, p < 0.01) were detected with concomitant loperamide. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that concomitant loperamide use was associated with signals for neutropenia, anemia, and alopecia.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that loperamide increases the risk of irinotecan-induced adverse events and enhances irinotecan toxicity. The study methodology may be useful for predicting adverse event risk when choosing symptomatic therapy drugs during irinotecan use.

References
1.
Fujii H, Ueda Y, Hirose C, Ohata K, Sekiya K, Kitahora M . Pharmaceutical intervention for adverse events improves quality of life in patients with cancer undergoing outpatient chemotherapy. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2022; 8(1):8. PMC: 8889741. DOI: 10.1186/s40780-022-00239-w. View

2.
Yamamoto N, Takahashi T, Kunikane H, Masuda N, Eguchi K, Shibuya M . Phase I/II pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic study of UGT1A1 polymorphism in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with irinotecan. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 85(2):149-54. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2008.152. View

3.
Takasuna K, Hagiwara T, Hirohashi M, Kato M, Nomura M, Nagai E . Involvement of beta-glucuronidase in intestinal microflora in the intestinal toxicity of the antitumor camptothecin derivative irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats. Cancer Res. 1996; 56(16):3752-7. View

4.
Rothenberg M, Eckardt J, Kuhn J, Burris 3rd H, Nelson J, Hilsenbeck S . Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with progressive or rapidly recurrent colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(4):1128-35. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1128. View

5.
Kornblau S, Benson A, Catalano R, Champlin R, Engelking C, Field M . Management of cancer treatment-related diarrhea. Issues and therapeutic strategies. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000; 19(2):118-29. DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00149-9. View