» Articles » PMID: 39443123

Frequency and Prognostic Impact of CDKN2A/B Alteration in Oligodendrogliomas: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Neurosurgery
Date 2024 Oct 23
PMID 39443123
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) -mutant astrocytomas with homozygous deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase 2A/B (CDKN2A/B-HomoD) are categorized to grade 4 in the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification. However, the clinical implications of CDKN2A/B-HomoD in oligodendrogliomas remain unclear. This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature on molecularly defined oligodendrogliomas (mOlig) to find the frequency and prognostic significance of CDKN2A/B gene alterations. Overall survival was worse in patients with CDKN2A/B-HomoD [pooled hazard ratio (pHR) 2.44; 95% confidential interval (CI), 1.59-3.76; P < 0.0001; 7 studies, 1,012 patients] than in those without CDKN2A/B-HomoD. Although the frequency (95% CI) was very low in grade 2 tumors (0.31%; 0.02-0.4) than in grade 3 tumors (9.4%; 6.2-14.0; I = 52.0%), pHR of multivariate analyses with covariates of WHO grade and age was still significant (P = 0.017). In contrast, the method in CDKN2A/B evaluation was a significant factor for the heterogeneity in frequency. The pooled frequency of CDKN2A/B-HomoD in grade 3 mOlig by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (20.3%) was higher than that by other methods (7.3%; P < 0.0006), probably due to the lower threshold for CDKN2A/B-HomoD in FISH studies that was used in this analysis. The frequency (95% CI) of other alterations of the CDKN2A/B gene, i.e., mutation, hemizygous deletion, and promoter methylation, was estimated as 1.48% (0.6-3.5), 15.9% (9.8-24.7), and 20.6% (13.7-29.8), respectively. The clinical significance of these alterations remains unclear due to the immaturity of the investigations.

References
1.
van Vlodrop I, Niessen H, Derks S, Baldewijns M, Van Criekinge W, Herman J . Analysis of promoter CpG island hypermethylation in cancer: location, location, location!. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(13):4225-31. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3394. View

2.
Ferrer-Luna R, Nunez L, Piquer J, Arias E, Dasi F, Cervio A . Whole-genomic survey of oligodendroglial tumors: correlation between allelic imbalances and gene expression profiles. J Neurooncol. 2010; 103(1):71-85. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0369-4. View

3.
Jonsson P, Lin A, Young R, DiStefano N, Hyman D, Li B . Genomic Correlates of Disease Progression and Treatment Response in Prospectively Characterized Gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(18):5537-5547. PMC: 6753053. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0032. View

4.
Kuo L, Kuo K, Lee M, Wei C, Scaravilli F, Tsai J . Correlation among pathology, genetic and epigenetic profiles, and clinical outcome in oligodendroglial tumors. Int J Cancer. 2009; 124(12):2872-9. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24303. View

5.
Hozo S, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I . Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:13. PMC: 1097734. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13. View