» Articles » PMID: 39441626

Development of a Digital Health Intervention for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (INTERCEPT): Co-Design and Usability Testing Study

Abstract

Background: Secondary prevention is an important strategy to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the growing evidence for the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) for the secondary prevention of CVD, the majority are designed with minimal input from target end users, resulting in poor uptake and usage.

Objective: This study aimed to optimize the acceptance and effectiveness of a DHI for the secondary prevention of CVD through co-design, integrating end users' perspectives throughout.

Methods: A theory-driven, person-based approach using co-design was adopted for the development of the DHI, known as INTERCEPT. This involved a 4-phase iterative process using online workshops. In phase 1, a stakeholder team of health care professionals, software developers, and public and patient involvement members was established. Phase 2 involved identification of the guiding principles, content, and design features of the DHI. In phase 3, DHI prototypes were reviewed for clarity of language, ease of navigation, and functionality. To anticipate and interpret DHI usage, phase 4 involved usability testing with participants who had a recent cardiac event (<2 years). To assess the potential impact of usability testing, the System Usability Scale was administered before and after testing. The GUIDED (Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development Studies in Health Research) checklist was used to report the development process.

Results: Five key design principles were identified: simplicity and ease of use, behavioral change through goal setting and self-monitoring, personalization, system credibility, and social support. Usability testing resulted in 64 recommendations for the app, of which 51 were implemented. Improvements in System Usability Scale scores were observed when comparing the results before and after implementing the recommendations (61 vs 83; P=.02).

Conclusions: Combining behavior change theory with a person-based, co-design approach facilitated the development of a DHI for the secondary prevention of CVD that optimized responsiveness to end users' needs and preferences, thereby potentially improving future engagement.

References
1.
Neubeck L, Freedman B, Lowres N, Hyun K, Orchard J, Briffa T . Choice of Health Options in Prevention of Cardiovascular Events (CHOICE) Replication Study. Heart Lung Circ. 2017; 27(12):1406-1414. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.09.016. View

2.
Kotseva K, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Ryden L, Hoes A, Grobbee D . Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019; 26(8):824-835. DOI: 10.1177/2047487318825350. View

3.
Tay B, Edney S, Brinkworth G, Cox D, Wiggins B, Davis A . Co-design of a digital dietary intervention for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):2071. PMC: 8582335. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12102-y. View

4.
Cruz-Cobo C, Bernal-Jimenez M, Vazquez-Garcia R, Santi-Cano M . Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions in the Control of Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients After a Coronary Event: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(12):e39593. PMC: 9758644. DOI: 10.2196/39593. View

5.
Gallegos-Rejas V, Rawstorn J, Gallagher R, Mahoney R, Thomas E . Key features in telehealth-delivered cardiac rehabilitation required to optimize cardiovascular health in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and realist synthesis. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(3):208-218. PMC: 11104477. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad080. View