» Articles » PMID: 39440248

The Prognostic Significance of Synchronous Metastasis in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis Using SEER Data

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Oct 23
PMID 39440248
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with synchronous metastasis(SM) is a rare occurrence. We extracted the data of GBM patients from the SEER database to look into the incidence of SM in GBM, determine the prognostic significance of SM in GBM, and assess therapeutic options for patients presenting with SM.

Methods: From 2004 to 2015, information on GBM patients was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to mitigate confounding factors between SM and non-SM groups, subsequently investigating the prognostic significance of SM in patients with GBM. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were employed to identify independent prognostic variables for GBM patients with SM. A forest plot was used to visualize the results.

Results: A cohort of 19,708 patients was obtained from the database, among which 272 (1.4%) had SM at the time of diagnosis. Following PSM at a 3:1 ratio, in both univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, SM (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.09-1.46) was found to be an independent predictive predictor for GBM patients. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazard forest plot demonstrated that independent risk variables for GBM patients with SM included age (Old vs. Young, HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.88), surgery (biopsy vs. no surgery, HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.96;Subtotal resection vs. no surgery, HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.68;Gross total resection vs. no surgery, HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.31-0.62), radiotherapy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.83), and chemotherapy (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72).

Conclusion: The predictive value of SM in GBM was determined by this propensity-matched analysis using data from the SEER database. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery constitute an effective treatment regimen for patients with SM. A more positive approach toward the use of aggressive treatment for GBM patients with SM may be warranted.

References
1.
Shibahara I, Saito R, Osada Y, Kanamori M, Sonoda Y, Kumabe T . Incidence of initial spinal metastasis in glioblastoma patients and the importance of spinal screening using MRI. J Neurooncol. 2018; 141(2):337-345. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03036-4. View

2.
Ostrom Q, Price M, Neff C, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C . CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020. Neuro Oncol. 2023; 25(12 Suppl 2):iv1-iv99. PMC: 10550277. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad149. View

3.
Lombard A, Goffart N, Rogister B . Glioblastoma Circulating Cells: Reality, Trap or Illusion?. Stem Cells Int. 2015; 2015:182985. PMC: 4452868. DOI: 10.1155/2015/182985. View

4.
Witoonpanich P, Bamrungrak K, Jinawath A, Wongwaisayawan S, Phudhichareonrat S, Witoonpanich R . Glioblastoma multiforme at the corpus callosum with spinal leptomeningeal metastasis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011; 113(5):407-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.12.001. View

5.
Georgescu M, Olar A . Genetic and histologic spatiotemporal evolution of recurrent, multifocal, multicentric and metastatic glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020; 8(1):10. PMC: 6998196. DOI: 10.1186/s40478-020-0889-x. View