Does Defect Configuration Affect the Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation? An Experimental Study
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the bone healing potential of 1-, 2-, and 3-wall defects following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) treatment, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of ARP as a treatment option for destructive sites.
Methods: Three groups, characterized by 1-, 2-, and 3-wall defects, were randomly assigned to the maxillary second, third, and fourth premolars in each of 8 beagle dogs. Each defect was created at either the mesial or distal root site of the tooth, which was hemi-sectioned and extracted. The contralateral root was preserved to superimpose with the experimental site for histomorphometric analysis. For each site, either spontaneous healing (SH; control) or ARP (test intervention) was randomly applied. Each group was divided in half and underwent a healing period of either 4 or 12 weeks. The Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for histomorphometric analyses. Statistical significance was set at <0.05.
Results: Qualitative analysis revealed a higher percentage of new bone in the apical area compared to the coronal area, regardless of defect type and healing period. In quantitative analysis, the 3-wall defect exhibited a significantly higher percentage of mineralization in the ARP group after 12 weeks of healing (ARP: 61.73%±7.52%; SH: 48.84%±3.06%; =0.029). An increased percentage of mineralization was observed with a greater number of remaining bony walls, although this finding did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, ARP treatment for compromised sockets appears to yield a higher percentage of mineralization compared to SH. Although the effectiveness of the remaining bony walls was limited, their presence appeared to improve the percentage of mineralization in ARP treatment.