» Articles » PMID: 39438858

What Do Older Women Want from a Physical Activity Program? Stakeholder Consultation to Optimise Design and Recruitment for the Active Women over 50 Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Oct 22
PMID 39438858
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Effective recruitment and retention of participants are prerequisites for high quality physical activity intervention programs and evaluation trials, but this is underreported in the literature making it difficult to identify the most promising strategies. Incorporating stakeholder feedback in the design of program components and recruitment materials can optimise recruitment reach and the engagement of participants throughout programs and trials.

Methods: The Active Women over 50 randomised controlled trial is testing a program designed to support women aged 50 + to be more physically active. To optimise program design and recruitment flyers, we conducted one focus group and 17 interviews with diverse purposively sampled women aged 50 + living in New South Wales, Australia. Women were asked to review recruitment flyers and the four proposed program components: (1) health coaching, (2) dedicated website with resources, (3) private Facebook group and (4) motivational email and SMS messages. Data analysis incorporated framework methods, deductive analysis using the Adapted Mobile App Rating Scale for evaluating websites and abductive analysis to critique the underlying program theory.

Results: Five themes were identified in relation to recruitment: I want to see (women like) myself, Keep it real, Readability is for everyone, Why should I do it? and Find us where we live. The four program components were strongly supported as a package, but were valued differently for their relative importance. Results were used to refine the health coaching scheduling; website appearance and content; promotion and moderation of the Facebook group; and the structure, appearance and content of messages. Not all suggestions were actionable due to technological and time constraints, and the desire to keep program costs low enough for delivery at scale during the study and beyond. The program theory was expanded to encompass two emergent concepts.

Conclusions: This consultation resulted in substantial refinements to recruitment flyers and strategies, and all four program components. We anticipate that these refinements will increase the reach and appeal of the trial and optimise future scale-up. Consultation feedback, while specific to this program, may have wider transferability for recruitment and the design of programs with similar components targeting women aged 50+.

References
1.
Bondarev D, Laakkonen E, Finni T, Kokko K, Kujala U, Aukee P . Physical performance in relation to menopause status and physical activity. Menopause. 2018; 25(12):1432-1441. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001137. View

2.
Fortier M, Duda J, Guerin E, Teixeira P . Promoting physical activity: development and testing of self-determination theory-based interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:20. PMC: 3353256. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-20. View

3.
Irani E . The Use of Videoconferencing for Qualitative Interviewing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations. Clin Nurs Res. 2018; 28(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1177/1054773818803170. View

4.
Wallbank G, Haynes A, Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Grunseit A . Designing physical activity interventions for women aged 50+: a qualitative study of participant perspectives. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1855. PMC: 9531643. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14237-y. View

5.
Smith D, Duque L, Huffman J, Healy B, Celano C . Text Message Interventions for Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 58(1):142-151. PMC: 6956854. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.014. View