» Articles » PMID: 39434981

Future Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Agricultural Yields, Production, and Market

Overview
Journal Anthropocene
Date 2024 Oct 22
PMID 39434981
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study provides estimates of climate change impacts on U.S. agricultural yields and the agricultural economy through the end of the 21st century, utilizing multiple climate scenarios. Results from a process-based crop model project future increases in wheat, grassland, and soybean yield due to climate change and atmospheric CO change; corn and sorghum show more muted responses. Results using yields from econometric models show less positive results. Both the econometric and process-based models tend to show more positive yields by the end of the century than several other similar studies. Using the process-based model to provide future yield estimates to an integrated agricultural sector model, the welfare gain is roughly $16B/year (2019 USD) for domestic producers and $6.2B/year for international trade, but domestic consumers lose $10.6B/year, resulting in a total welfare gain of $11.7B/year. When yield projections for major crops are drawn instead from econometric models, total welfare losses of more than $28B/year arise. Simulations using the process-based model as input to the agricultural sector model show large future production increases for soybean, wheat, and sorghum and large price reductions for corn and wheat. The most important factors are those about economic growth, flooding, international trade, and the type of yield model used. Somewhat less, but not insignificant factors include adaptation, livestock productivity, and damages from surface ozone, waterlogging, and pests and diseases.

Citing Articles

Advancing forest carbon projections requires improved convergence between ecological and economic models.

Fuller M, Ganjam M, Baker J, Abt R Carbon Balance Manag. 2025; 20(1):2.

PMID: 39792318 PMC: 11721258. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-024-00290-0.

References
1.
Augustine D, Blumenthal D, Springer T, LeCain D, Gunter S, Derner J . Elevated CO induces substantial and persistent declines in forage quality irrespective of warming in mixedgrass prairie. Ecol Appl. 2018; 28(3):721-735. DOI: 10.1002/eap.1680. View

2.
Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, Ruane A, Muller C, Arneth A . Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 111(9):3268-73. PMC: 3948251. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110. View

3.
Beach R, Sulser T, Crimmins A, Cenacchi N, Cole J, Fukagawa N . Combining the effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide on protein, iron, and zinc availability and projected climate change on global diets: a modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2019; 3(7):e307-e317. PMC: 7652103. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30094-4. View

4.
Kukal M, Irmak S . U.S. Agro-Climate in 20 Century: Growing Degree Days, First and Last Frost, Growing Season Length, and Impacts on Crop Yields. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):6977. PMC: 5934404. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25212-2. View

5.
Arduini I, Kokubun M, Licausi F . Editorial: Crop Response to Waterlogging. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 10:1578. PMC: 6927280. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01578. View