» Articles » PMID: 39431364

Oral, Vaginal, and Stool Microbial Signatures in Patients With Endometriosis As Potential Diagnostic Non-Invasive Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2024 Oct 21
PMID 39431364
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify a microbial signature for endometriosis for use as a diagnostic non-invasive biomarker.

Design: Prospective cohort pilot study.

Setting: Nepean Hospital and UNSW Microbiome Research Centre, Australia.

Population: Sixty-four age- and sex-matched subjects (n = 19 healthy control (HC); n = 24 non-endometriosis (N-ENDO) and n = 21 confirmed endometriosis (ENDO)). All study participants, besides healthy controls, underwent laparoscopic surgical assessment for endometriosis, and histology was performed on excised lesions.

Methods: Oral, stool and, vaginal samples were self-collected at a single time point for healthy controls, and preoperatively for patients undergoing laparoscopy. Samples underwent 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, followed by bioinformatics analysis.

Main Outcome Measures: Compositional differences between cohorts as identified by diversity analyses, and differentially abundant microbial taxa, as identified by LEfSE analysis.

Results: The composition of the oral (adjusted p = 0.003), and stool (adjusted p = 0.042) microbiota is different between the three cohorts. Differentially abundant taxa are present within each cohort as identified by LEfSE analysis. Particularly, Fusobacterium was enriched in the oral samples of patients with moderate/severe endometriosis.

Conclusions: Taxonomic and compositional differences were found between the microbiota in the mouth, gut and, vagina of patients with and without endometriosis and healthy controls. Fusobacterium was enriched in patients with moderate/severe endometriosis. Fusobacterium is noted as a key pathogen in periodontal disease, a common comorbidity in endometriosis. These findings suggest a role for the oral, stool and, vaginal microbiome in endometriosis, and present potential for microbial-based treatments and the design of a diagnostic swab.

Citing Articles

Dietary and Nutritional Interventions for the Management of Endometriosis.

Abulughod N, Valakas S, El-Assaad F Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683382 PMC: 11643425. DOI: 10.3390/nu16233988.


The Critical Role of Host and Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles in Endometriosis.

Wagner M, Hicks C, El-Omar E, Combes V, El-Assaad F Biomedicines. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39595151 PMC: 11591939. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112585.

References
1.
Khan K, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Yamaguchi N, Katamine S, Matsuyama T . Escherichia coli contamination of menstrual blood and effect of bacterial endotoxin on endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(7):2860-3.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.053. View

2.
Strout N, Pasic L, Hicks C, Chua X, Tashvighi N, Butler P . The MothersBabies Study, an Australian Prospective Cohort Study Analyzing the Microbiome in the Preconception and Perinatal Period to Determine Risk of Adverse Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Child-Related Health Outcomes: Study Protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(18). PMC: 10531411. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20186736. View

3.
Blaser M . The microbiome revolution. J Clin Invest. 2014; 124(10):4162-5. PMC: 4191014. DOI: 10.1172/JCI78366. View

4.
Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S . DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(7):581-3. PMC: 4927377. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. View

5.
Ser H, Au Yong S, Shafiee M, Mokhtar N, Ali R . Current Updates on the Role of Microbiome in Endometriosis: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2). PMC: 9962481. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020360. View