» Articles » PMID: 39431169

Enhancing Public Entertainment with Touch: Possibilities and Pitfalls

Overview
Journal Iperception
Date 2024 Oct 21
PMID 39431169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has long been interest in augmenting cinematic and other forms of public entertainment through tactile and/or bodily (i.e., vestibular) stimulation. In this narrative historical review, the early history of touch (or haptics, as it is sometimes called) and other forms of bodily stimulation (e.g., motion platforms) in the context of entertainment is critically reviewed, with a focus on early cinema as well as other early examples of immersive virtual reality travel experiences. Critically, various challenges have limited the introduction of such additional channels of sensory stimulation. These include technological, financial, cognitive, creative, ethical/artistic, and also legal considerations, given the many patents that currently exist covering commercial digital tactile stimulation (e.g., in the gaming context). Taken together, these challenges help to explain why it is that despite the early interest in "the feelies" (e.g., an envisioning of film that includes tactile sensations by Aldous Huxley, in his novel Brave New World), touch-enhanced cinema and storytelling have never really caught on in the mainstream in the way that, say, the talkies so obviously did following the introduction of sound into cinema in the early decades of the 20th century. Nevertheless, identifying the potential successful use cases that have emerged from previous attempts to augment public entertainments with tactile/bodily stimulation will likely provide useful guidelines for the future tactile augmentation of home entertainment.

Citing Articles

Augmenting home entertainment with digitally delivered touch.

Spence C, Gao Y Iperception. 2024; 15(5):20416695241281474.

PMID: 39431170 PMC: 11490966. DOI: 10.1177/20416695241281474.

References
1.
Furley P, Goldschmied N . Systematic vs. Narrative Reviews in Sport and Exercise Psychology: Is Either Approach Superior to the Other?. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:685082. PMC: 8299000. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685082. View

2.
Facchini S, Aglioti S . Short term light deprivation increases tactile spatial acuity in humans. Neurology. 2003; 60(12):1998-9. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000068026.15208.d0. View

3.
Hutmacher F . Why Is There So Much More Research on Vision Than on Any Other Sensory Modality?. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:2246. PMC: 6787282. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02246. View

4.
Felleman D, Van Essen D . Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1991; 1(1):1-47. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a. View

5.
Spence C, Baddeley R, Zampini M, James R, Shore D . Multisensory temporal order judgments: when two locations are better than one. Percept Psychophys. 2003; 65(2):318-28. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194803. View