» Articles » PMID: 39427151

Nourishing the Mind: How the EAT-Lancet Reference Diet (ELD) and MIND Diet Impact Stress, Anxiety, and Depression

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 Oct 19
PMID 39427151
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous studies have suggested a link between diet and mental health. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the association between emerging diets such as the EAT-Lancet reference diet (ELD) and the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet, and mental health in different societies. This study aimed to determine the association between adherence to ELD and MIND diets and the risk of depression, anxiety, and stress.

Methods: This research involved 4579 participants from the PERSIAN Organizational Cohort Study in Mashhad (POCM). To assess dietary intake, a comprehensive 118-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was employed. The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was used to assess adherence to the ELD. Mental health status was evaluated using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 items (DASS-21) questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was utilized to examine the relationship between these scores and mental health indicators.

Results: In the adjusted model, the highest quartile of PHDI showed a 35% reduced risk of depression compared to those in the lowest quartile (OR: 0.653, 95% CI: 0.483-0.883; P = 0.008). However, compared to the reference quartile, participants in the highest quartile of MIND diet exhibited significantly lower risks of depression (OR: 0.611, 95% CI: 0.447-0.836; P = 0.005), anxiety (OR: 0.559, 95% CI: 0.418-0.746; P < 0.001), and stress (OR: 0.629, 95% CI: 0.419-0.944; P = 0.008).

Conclusions: The ELD and MIND diet were both associated with reduced odds of depression. Additionally, MIND diet was associated with decreased likelihood of anxiety and stress. However, no connection was observed between ELD and anxiety or stress. Further large-scale interventions are required to confirm these findings.

References
1.
Tohidinezhad F, Khorsand A, Zakavi S, Rezvani R, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Abrishami M . The burden and predisposing factors of non-communicable diseases in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences personnel: a prospective 15-year organizational cohort study protocol and baseline assessment. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1637. PMC: 7607841. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09704-3. View

2.
Moska C, Goudriaan A, Blanken P, Hendriks V . Accuracy of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) for Screening on Comorbid Internalizing Disorders among Youth in Substance Use Disorder Treatment. Eur Addict Res. 2023; 29(6):385-393. DOI: 10.1159/000533726. View

3.
Eghtesad S, Hekmatdoost A, Faramarzi E, Homayounfar R, Sharafkhah M, Hakimi H . Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire assessing food group intake in the PERSIAN Cohort Study. Front Nutr. 2023; 10:1059870. PMC: 10436288. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1059870. View

4.
Cacau L, De Carli E, Martins de Carvalho A, Lotufo P, Moreno L, Bensenor I . Development and Validation of an Index Based on EAT-Lancet Recommendations: The Planetary Health Diet Index. Nutrients. 2021; 13(5). PMC: 8156093. DOI: 10.3390/nu13051698. View

5.
Young H . Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet: Unintended Consequences for the Brain?. Nutrients. 2022; 14(20). PMC: 9607064. DOI: 10.3390/nu14204254. View