Age Dependence of the Average Refractive Index of the Isolated Human Crystalline Lens

Overview

Journal Biomed Opt Express

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Oct 18

PMID 39421764

Authors

Ramya Natarajan

Bianca Maceo Heilman

Marco Ruggeri

Arthur Ho

Vivek M Singh

Robert Augusteyn

Jean-Marie Parel

Pravin K Vaddavalli

Fabrice Manns

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We measured the average group refractive index (RI) of 120 isolated lenses from 120 human donors (age: 0.03 to 61 years). The average group RI was calculated from a measurement of the optical thickness of the lens using optical coherence tomography and the apparent window shift of the test chamber caused by the lens. The estimated measurement uncertainty was ±0.004. The group RI at 880 nm was converted to phase RI at 589 nm using the dispersion equation of water and protein. From 2 to 61 years, the mean value of the RI was 1.415 ± 0.002 (group index at 880 nm) and 1.406 ± 0.002 (phase index at 589 nm) independent of age (p = 0.774). Two lenses from donors of age 0.33 and 3 months had significantly lower RI (group index: 1.405 and 1.403; phase index: 1.396 and 1.394). From age 2 to 61, the average lens RI is constant with age within the measurement uncertainty (±0.004).

References

Augusteyn R . On the growth and internal structure of the human lens. Exp Eye Res. 2010; 90(6):643-54. PMC: 2871961. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.01.013. View

Smith G . The optical properties of the crystalline lens and their significance. Clin Exp Optom. 2003; 86(1):3-18. View

Augusteyn R . On the contribution of the nucleus and cortex to human lens shape and size. Clin Exp Optom. 2017; 101(1):64-68. PMC: 6602556. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12539. View

Chang Y, Monterano Mesquita G, Williams S, Gregori G, Cabot F, Ho A . measurement of the human crystalline lens equivalent refractive index using extended-depth OCT. Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(2):411-422. PMC: 6377882. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.000411. View

Jones C, Atchison D, Meder R, Pope J . Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Vision Res. 2005; 45(18):2352-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.008. View

de Castro A, Birkenfeld J, Maceo Heilman B, Ruggeri M, Arrieta E, Parel J . Off-axis optical coherence tomography imaging of the crystalline lens to reconstruct the gradient refractive index using optical methods. Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(7):3622-3634. PMC: 6640821. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.003622. View

Borja D, Siedlecki D, de Castro A, Uhlhorn S, Ortiz S, Arrieta E . Distortions of the posterior surface in optical coherence tomography images of the isolated crystalline lens: effect of the lens index gradient. Biomed Opt Express. 2011; 1(5):1331-1340. PMC: 3018115. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.1.001331. View

Pierscionek B, Smith G, Augusteyn R . The refractive increments of bovine alpha-, beta-, and gamma-crystallins. Vision Res. 1987; 27(9):1539-41. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90162-3. View

de Castro A, Siedlecki D, Borja D, Uhlhorn S, Parel J, Manns F . Age-dependent variation of the Gradient Index profile in human crystalline lenses. J Mod Opt. 2012; 58(19-20):1781-1787. PMC: 3408875. DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2011.565888. View

10.

Khan A, Pope J, Verkicharla P, Suheimat M, Atchison D . Change in human lens dimensions, lens refractive index distribution and ciliary body ring diameter with accommodation. Biomed Opt Express. 2018; 9(3):1272-1282. PMC: 5846530. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.001272. View

11.

Dubbelman M, van der Heijde G, Weeber H . The thickness of the aging human lens obtained from corrected Scheimpflug images. Optom Vis Sci. 2001; 78(6):411-6. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200106000-00013. View

12.

Moffat B, Atchison D, Pope J . Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro. Vision Res. 2002; 42(13):1683-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00078-0. View

13.

Pierscionek B, Regini J . The gradient index lens of the eye: an opto-biological synchrony. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012; 31(4):332-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.03.001. View

14.

Mohamed A, Durkee H, Williams S, Manns F, Ho A, Parel J . Morphometric analysis of in vitro human crystalline lenses using digital shadow photogrammetry. Exp Eye Res. 2020; 202:108334. PMC: 7855983. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108334. View

15.

Augusteyn R, Jones C, Pope J . Age-related development of a refractive index plateau in the human lens: evidence for a distinct nucleus. Clin Exp Optom. 2008; 91(3):296-301. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00244.x. View

16.

Kasthurirangan S, Markwell E, Atchison D, Pope J . In vivo study of changes in refractive index distribution in the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(6):2531-40. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1443. View

17.

Uhlhorn S, Borja D, Manns F, Parel J . Refractive index measurement of the isolated crystalline lens using optical coherence tomography. Vision Res. 2008; 48(27):2732-8. PMC: 2660522. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.010. View

18.

Charman W, Atchison D . Age-dependence of the average and equivalent refractive indices of the crystalline lens. Biomed Opt Express. 2014; 5(1):31-9. PMC: 3891341. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.5.000031. View

19.

Augusteyn R . Growth of the lens: in vitro observations. Clin Exp Optom. 2008; 91(3):226-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00255.x. View

20.

Martinez-Enriquez E, de Castro A, Mohamed A, Sravani N, Ruggeri M, Manns F . Age-Related Changes to the Three-Dimensional Full Shape of the Isolated Human Crystalline Lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020; 61(4):11. PMC: 7401430. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.4.11. View