» Articles » PMID: 39420917

Optimal Treatment Targets for Lupus Nephritis Using Per-protocol Repeat Kidney Biopsy Findings at 2 years and Clinical Data Up to 5 years: a Single-center Observational Study

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Oct 18
PMID 39420917
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The criteria for remission in both clinical and pathological contexts for lupus nephritis (LN) remain controversial.

Objectives: To identify optimal short-term goals (remission criteria) for LN predicting long-term success at 5 years, using repeat kidney biopsy (Biopsy 2) and clinical data.

Design: Single-center observational study.

Methods: Twenty-three consecutive LN patients undergoing Biopsy 2 2 years post-induction therapy were evaluated. Two ideal long-term goals at 5 years were defined as: "A," Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) = 0 and prednisolone (PSL) ⩽5 mg/day, and "B," proteinuria ⩽0.2 g/day with a normal serum creatinine level and PSL ⩽5 mg/day. Histologically, the electron-dense deposit (EDD) score grades immune deposits based on their intensity, amount, and location. A score of ⩽1 was defined as "electron microscopy remission (ER)."

Results: Conventional renal indices failed to predict long-term goals. The short-term goals with an accuracy (area under the curve: 95% confidence interval) of ⩾0.8 predicted long-term goals: "A at 5 years" (A-5y), A-2y (0.91: 0.79-1.00), DORIS-R-2y (0.87: 0.72-1.00), EDD score (0.85: 0.70-1.00), B-2y (0.83: 0.66-0.99), and SLEDAI-R-2y (0.82: 0.66-0.98) as well as "B at 5 years" (B-5y), A-2y (0.87: 0.73-1.00), B-2y (0.87: 0.73-1.00), EDD score (0.85: 0.69-1.00), and DORIS-R-2y (0.83: 0.67-0.99). EDD scores predicted A-5y, B-5y, and PSL dose at 5 years in proportion to the score. The clinical and histological goals aligned.

Conclusion: The best predictive short-term goal was A-2y. Concordance between clinical remission (A-2y, B-2y, and DORIS-R-2y) and histological remission (ER) at 2 years suggests optimal short-term goals for LN.

References
1.
Katsuyama E, Miyawaki Y, Sada K, Asano Y, Hayashi K, Yamamura Y . Association of explanatory histological findings and urinary protein and serum creatinine levels at renal biopsy in lupus nephritis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2020; 21(1):208. PMC: 7268330. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01868-9. View

2.
Alsuwaida A, Husain S, Alghonaim M, Aloudah N, Alwakeel J, Ullah A . Strategy for second kidney biopsy in patients with lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 27(4):1472-8. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr517. View

3.
Kagawa H, Yamanaka R, Hiromasa T . First-line Combination Strategy Provides Favorable 5-year Outcomes for Patients with Lupus Nephritis: A Single-center Observational Study. Acta Med Okayama. 2022; 76(5):547-555. DOI: 10.18926/AMO/64036. View

4.
Reppe Moe S, Molberg O, Strom E, Lerang K . Assessing the relative impact of lupus nephritis on mortality in a population-based systemic lupus erythematosus cohort. Lupus. 2019; 28(7):818-825. DOI: 10.1177/0961203319847275. View

5.
Moroni G, Porata G, Raffiotta F, Quaglini S, Frontini G, Sacchi L . Beyond ISN/RPS Lupus Nephritis Classification: Adding Chronicity Index to Clinical Variables Predicts Kidney Survival. Kidney360. 2022; 3(1):122-132. PMC: 8967609. DOI: 10.34067/KID.0005512021. View