» Articles » PMID: 39416406

Formal Parental Leave Policies and Trainee Well-Being in US Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Grad Med Educ
Date 2024 Oct 17
PMID 39416406
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Variability in parental leave policies across graduate medical education (GME) programs in the United States complicates efforts to support resident wellness and identify best practices for resident well-being. This review aims to assess how formal parental leave policies affect trainees' well-being, professional satisfaction, and performance during training. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines was conducted and registered on PROSPERO in May 2023. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central. Studies that evaluated parental leave policies of US-based GME programs and their direct impact on residents and/or fellows were included. Studies were screened for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers, and any conflicts were resolved by a third author. Of 1068 articles screened, 43 articles met inclusion criteria. These studies highlighted that leave durations of less than 6 weeks were associated with higher rates of burnout and postpartum depression among trainees. There was no evidence that taking parental leave increased program attrition rate; however, 3 studies reported more than one-third of trainees extended training as a result of taking leave. Trainees who had more than 8 weeks of parental leave reported more successful breastfeeding 6 months out from delivery than those with less than 8 weeks of leave. Extended parental leave, notably beyond 6 weeks, improved trainee well-being and professional satisfaction. Based on trainees' perspectives, ideal parental leave policies offer a minimum of 6 to 8 weeks of leave, with a formal and clearly written policy available.

Citing Articles

To the Editor: Time to Redefine Medical Training: Supporting New Parents with Time-Flexible Models.

Campbell C J Grad Med Educ. 2025; 17(1):117-118.

PMID: 39980966 PMC: 11838064. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00916.1.


To the Editor: Medicine, Parenthood, and Well-Being: How Do We Achieve the Trifecta?.

McKane J, Duignan A, Swan A, Galbraith S J Grad Med Educ. 2025; 17(1):115-116.

PMID: 39980963 PMC: 11838059. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00930.1.

References
1.
Castillo-Angeles M, Stucke R, Rosenkranz K, Smink D, Rangel E . Paternity Leave During Surgical Training: Perspectives of Male Residents. J Surg Educ. 2022; 79(6):e85-e91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.04.012. View

2.
Shifflette V, Hambright S, Amos J, Dunn E, Allo M . The pregnant female surgical resident. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018; 9:365-369. PMC: 5957061. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S140738. View

3.
Grant M, Booth A . A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2):91-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. View

4.
Hutchinson A, Anderson 3rd N, Gochnour G, Stewart C . Pregnancy and childbirth during family medicine residency training. Fam Med. 2011; 43(3):160-5. View

5.
Ruse S, Bergman R, Crawford E . Pregnancy in Orthopaedic Residents: Peripartum Barriers Identified. JB JS Open Access. 2023; 7(4). PMC: 9788970. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00098. View