» Articles » PMID: 39413989

Effectiveness and Costs of the Recruitment Strategies Used in the MetA-Bone Trial, a Randomized Clinical Trial to Test the Effects of Soluble Corn Fiber Supplementation for 1 year in Children

Abstract

Background: Pediatric recruitment into clinical trials is very challenging. A recruitment plan was designed to recruit healthy children (9-14 years) in a trial testing the 1-year effect of corn soluble fiber supplementation on bone mass. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in this trial.

Methods: The recruitment plan included "Traditional" (mailings, flyers, posters, visits, snowball, etc.) or "Online" (email campaigns, social media, website, etc.) strategies. All strategies led to the pre-screening online form, which asked how they learned about the study. This analysis includes the number of pre-screenings and enrollment (consents signed), ineligibility, socio-demographics, and costs per strategy. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square.

Results: 649 individuals completed the pre-screening; 37.1 % came from "Traditional", 46.7 % from "Online", 2.6 % from "Other", and 13.6 % from "Unknown" strategies. The most successful strategies were related to Florida International University (posting flyers around campus and email campaigns). The main reasons for ineligibility were obesity (38.9 %) or outside the age range (22.7 %). A total of 48.4 % of the children enrolled came from "Traditional", 50.2 % from "Online", and 1.4 % from "Other" strategies. The cost per screened participant was $1112 for "Traditional" and $512 for "Online" strategies, and the cost per enrolled participant was $2704 for "Traditional" and $1454 for "Online" strategies. The highest costs were staff salary.

Conclusion: "Online" strategies were more effective and had a lower implementation cost than "Traditional" strategies, although these were also important in achieving the recruitment goal. Future pediatric trials should consider some of these strategies and their costs.

Clinicaltrials: gov registry number: NCT02916862.

References
1.
Finan S, Swierzbiolek B, Priest N, Warren N, Yap M . Parental engagement in preventive parenting programs for child mental health: a systematic review of predictors and strategies to increase engagement. PeerJ. 2018; 6:e4676. PMC: 5926551. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4676. View

2.
Robinson L, Adair P, Coffey M, Harris R, Burnside G . Identifying the participant characteristics that predict recruitment and retention of participants to randomised controlled trials involving children: a systematic review. Trials. 2016; 17(1):294. PMC: 4918126. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1415-0. View

3.
Arasu K, Chang C, Wong S, Ong S, Yang W, Chong M . Design and strategies used for recruitment and retention in a double blind randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of soluble corn fiber on bone indices in pre-adolescent children (PREBONE-Kids study) in Malaysia. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021; 22:100801. PMC: 8233130. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100801. View

4.
Klassen T, Hartling L, Hamm M, van der Lee J, Ursum J, Offringa M . StaR Child Health: an initiative for RCTs in children. Lancet. 2009; 374(9698):1310-2. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61803-1. View

5.
Watson S, Smith P, Snowden J, Vaughn V, Cottrell L, Madden C . Facilitators and barriers to pediatric clinical trial recruitment and retention in rural and community settings: A scoping review of the literature. Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 15(4):838-853. PMC: 9010274. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13220. View