» Articles » PMID: 39409222

Design, Calibration and Morphological Characterization of a Flexible Sensor with Adjustable Chemical Sensitivity and Possible Applications to Sports Medicine

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Oct 16
PMID 39409222
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Active life monitoring via chemosensitive sensors could hold promise for enhancing athlete monitoring, training optimization, and performance in athletes. The present work investigates a resistive flex sensor (RFS) in the guise of a chemical sensor. Its carbon 'texture' has shown to be sensitive to CO, O, and RH changes; moreover, different bending conditions can modulate its sensitivity and selectivity for these gases and vapors. A three-step feasibility study is presented including: design and fabrication of the electronic read-out and control; calibration of the sensors to CO, O and RH; and a morphological study of the material when interacting with the gas and vapor molecules. The 0.1 mm curvature performs best among the tested configurations. It shows a linear response curve for each gas, the ranges of concentrations are adequate, and the sensitivity is good for all gases. The curvature can be modulated during data acquisition to tailor the sensitivity and selectivity for a specific gas. In particular, good results have been obtained with a curvature of 0.1 mm. For O in the range of 20-70%, the sensor has a sensitivity of 0.7 mV/%. For CO in the range of 4-80%, the sensitivity is 3.7 mV/%, and for RH the sensitivity is 33 mV/%. Additionally, a working principle, based on observation via scanning electron microscopy, has been proposed to explain the chemical sensing potential of this sensor. Bending seems to enlarge the cracks present in the RFS coverage; this change accounts for the altered selectivity depending on the sensor's curvature. Further studies are needed to confirm result's reliability and the correctness of the interpretation.

References
1.
Kim J, Campbell A, de Avila B, Wang J . Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37(4):389-406. PMC: 8183422. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y. View

2.
Aygun L, Kumar V, Weaver C, Gerber M, Wagner S, Verma N . Large-Area Resistive Strain Sensing Sheet for Structural Health Monitoring. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(5). PMC: 7085675. DOI: 10.3390/s20051386. View

3.
Konigstein K, Abegg S, Schorn A, Weber I, Derron N, Krebs A . Breath acetone change during aerobic exercise is moderated by cardiorespiratory fitness. J Breath Res. 2020; 15(1):016006. DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/abba6c. View

4.
Massaroni C, Saccomandi P, Schena E . Medical smart textiles based on fiber optic technology: an overview. J Funct Biomater. 2015; 6(2):204-21. PMC: 4493508. DOI: 10.3390/jfb6020204. View

5.
Dolson C, Harlow E, Phelan D, Gabbett T, Gaal B, McMellen C . Wearable Sensor Technology to Predict Core Body Temperature: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19). PMC: 9572283. DOI: 10.3390/s22197639. View