» Articles » PMID: 39407766

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Urogynecological Surgery: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery could improve cosmetic outcomes and reduce the risks of surgical injury with less postoperative pain and a quicker patient's discharge. Recently, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has been introduced in urogynecology with exciting results. After PROSPERO registration (n°CRD42023406815), we performed a comprehensive literature search on Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL, including peer-reviewed studies evaluating transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. No limits on time or type of study were applied. Overall, 12 manuscripts were included in the analysis. Seven studies evaluated uterosacral ligament suspension, four studies evaluated sacral colpopexy, three evaluated sacrospinous ligament suspension, and one study evaluated lateral suspension. Overall success rates were high (>90%); however, definitions of success were heterogeneous. In terms of complication, most of the studies reported low-grade complications (Clavien-Dindo I and II); only two patients needed mesh removal because of mesh exposure. The risk of bias of the trials was rated in the medium to high-risk category. The present review highlights important initial results for vNOTES. Future randomized clinical trials are needed to better define its role in the management of urogynecological procedures.

References
1.
Woelk J, Casiano E, Weaver A, Gostout B, Trabuco E, Gebhart J . The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 121(1):87-95. DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827a029e. View

2.
Lowenstein L, Baekelandt J, Paz Y, Lauterbach R, Matanes E . Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26(6):1015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.007. View

3.
Mothes A, Schlachetzki A, Nicolaus K, Vorwergk J, Lehmann T, Radosa M . LAVH superior to TVH when concomitant salpingo-oophorectomy is intended in prolapse hysterectomy: a comparative cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 298(6):1131-1137. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4909-z. View

4.
Orlando M, Greenberg C, Pavuluri Quamme S, Yee A, Faerber A, King C . Surgical coaching in obstetrics and gynecology: an evidence-based strategy to elevate surgical education and promote lifelong learning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(1):51-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.006. View

5.
Huang L, Feng D, Gu D, Lin Y, Gong Z, Liu D . Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in gynecological procedure: Experience of a Women's and Children's Medical Center from China. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022; 48(11):2926-2934. DOI: 10.1111/jog.15402. View