» Articles » PMID: 39407315

Transdermal Iontophoresis Versus High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound in Mechanical Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Oct 15
PMID 39407315
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The investigation aimed to assess the impacts of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) iontophoresis and high-power pain-threshold ultrasound (HPPT-US) on pain, range of motion (ROM), and functional activity in physical therapy students suffering from mechanical cervical pain.

Methods: Typically, 75 males aged 19 to 30 years suffering from mechanical neck pain were enrolled in this investigation. Participants were divided at random into three groups. Group A received iontophoresis plus conventional physical therapy program, Group B received HPPTUS along with conventional therapy, and Group C received conventional therapy only. The outcomes were pain evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) and Digital Electronic Pressure Algometer, cervical range of motion measured by Myrin gravity reference goniometer, and Arabic Neck disability index (ANDI) evaluate neck function.

Results: The differences within and between groups were detected utilizing a mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The within- and between-group analysis of all outcome measures revealed that there were statistically significant differences at post-intervention between high-power ultrasound and conventional group at all variables and also between iontophoresis and conventional group, but there was no statistically significant variation between high-power ultrasound and iontophoresis.

Conclusion: MgSO4 iontophoresis and HPPT-US are effective in decreasing pain, improving neck function, and improving neck ROM in subjects with mechanical neck pain who have active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) on the upper fibers of the trapezius with no superiority of one over the other.

Trail Registration: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry (registration no: NCT05474898) 26/7/2022.

References
1.
Borg-Stein J, Simons D . Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(3 Suppl 1):S40-7, S48-9. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32155. View

2.
Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas G . Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998; 30(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1080/003655098444255. View

3.
Hanten W, Olson S, Butts N, Nowicki A . Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(10):997-1003. View

4.
Ibrahim N, Abdel Raoof N, Mosaad D, Abu El Kasem S . Effect of magnesium sulfate iontophoresis on myofascial trigger points in the upper fibres of the trapezius. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021; 16(3):369-378. PMC: 8178646. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.12.015. View

5.
Cagnie B, Castelein B, Pollie F, Steelant L, Verhoeyen H, Cools A . Evidence for the Use of Ischemic Compression and Dry Needling in the Management of Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius in Patients with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 94(7):573-83. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000266. View