Toward a Universal Definition of Provider-patient Attachment in Primary Care

Overview

Journal Can Fam Physician

Specialties General Medicine
Public Health

Date 2024 Oct 15

PMID 39406419

Authors

Monica Aggarwal

Richard H Glazier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To explore definitions of provider-patient attachment in primary care (PC) and help inform a universal definition of provider-patient attachment.

Data Sources: Comprehensive searches were conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycInfo (Ovid), Social Sciences Abstracts (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase (Ovid), Google Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Study Selection: A scoping review was conducted. Articles focusing on PC setting, provider-patient attachment, and attachment approaches (enrolment, rostering, registration, empanelment) were included. All articles were from English-language publications and were available in full text in or after 2005. Of the 5955 unique titles, 97 peer-reviewed articles and 45 gray literature sources were included.

Synthesis: The term is sometimes used interchangeably with and . Provider-patient attachment is a confirmed affiliation between a patient and a regular primary care provider (PCP). This affiliation can be formal or informal. The goals are to deliver longitudinal care and establish a therapeutic relationship (relational continuity). Enrolment and empanelment are mechanisms that enable the affiliation of a patient with a PCP. Enrolment is a formal process of provider-patient affiliation, while empanelment is the assignment of a patient to a PCP.

Conclusion: A universal definition of is provided: the confirmed and documented affiliation between a patient and a regular PCP (a clinician, ie, a family physician or nurse practitioner, etc), or a combination of clinician and care team or practice in which the PCP is responsible for providing longitudinal and continuous care to the patient via any delivery channel (ie, in person, remotely, or both), enabled by provider access to patient health information.

References

Ionescu-Ittu R, McCusker J, Ciampi A, Vadeboncoeur A, Roberge D, Larouche D . Continuity of primary care and emergency department utilization among elderly people. CMAJ. 2007; 177(11):1362-8. PMC: 2072991. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.061615. View

Kantarevic J, Kralj B . Risk selection and cost shifting in a prospective physician payment system: evidence from Ontario. Health Policy. 2013; 115(2-3):249-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.10.002. View

Singh J, Dahrouge S, Green M . The impact of the adoption of a patient rostering model on primary care access and continuity of care in urban family practices in Ontario, Canada. BMC Fam Pract. 2019; 20(1):52. PMC: 6474046. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0942-7. View

Shin D, Cho J, Yang H, Park J, Lee H, Kim H . Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12(6):534-41. PMC: 4226774. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1685. View

Stagg H, Jones J, Bickler G, Abubakar I . Poor uptake of primary healthcare registration among recent entrants to the UK: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4). PMC: 4400681. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001453. View

Glazier R, Kopp A, Schultz S, Kiran T, Henry D . All the right intentions but few of the desired results: lessons on access to primary care from Ontario's patient enrolment models. Healthc Q. 2012; 15(3):17-21. DOI: 10.12927/hcq.2013.23041. View

Marx R, Drennan M, C Johnson E, Solnit S, Hirozawa A, Katz M . Creating a medical home in the San Francisco department of public health: establishing patient panels. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009; 15(4):337-44. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31819d81a3. View

Derrett S, Gunter K, Nocon R, Quinn M, Coleman K, Daniel D . How 3 rural safety net clinics integrate care for patients: a qualitative case study. Med Care. 2014; 52(11 Suppl 4):S39-47. PMC: 5052676. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000191. View

Gerlach F, Szecsenyi J . [Family doctor-centred care in Baden-Wuerttemberg: concept and results of a controlled evaluation study]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013; 107(6):365-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.07.002. View

10.

Kamnetz S, Trowbridge E, Lochner J, Koslov S, Pandhi N . A Simple Framework for Weighting Panels Across Primary Care Disciplines: Findings From a Large US Multidisciplinary Group Practice. Qual Manag Health Care. 2018; 27(4):185-190. PMC: 6166700. DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000190. View

11.

Glauser W . Virtual care has potential to fragment primary care and disturb continuity of care, warn doctors. CMAJ. 2019; 191(37):E1038-E1039. PMC: 6751041. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095796. View

12.

Fung C, Wong C, Fong D, Lee A, Lam C . Having a family doctor was associated with lower utilization of hospital-based health services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:42. PMC: 4312460. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0705-7. View

13.

Papp M, Korosi L, Sandor J, Nagy C, Juhasz A, Adany R . Workforce crisis in primary healthcare worldwide: Hungarian example in a longitudinal follow-up study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(7):e024957. PMC: 6661691. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024957. View

14.

McRae I, Yen L, Gillespie J, Douglas K . Patient affiliation with GPs in Australia--who is and who is not and does it matter?. Health Policy. 2010; 103(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.002. View

15.

Crooks V, Agarwal G, Harrison A . Chronically ill Canadians' experiences of being unattached to a family doctor: a qualitative study of marginalized patients in British Columbia. BMC Fam Pract. 2012; 13:69. PMC: 3412741. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-69. View

16.

Andreadis K, Muellers K, Ancker J, Horowitz C, Kaushal R, Lin J . Telemedicine Impact on the Patient-Provider Relationship in Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Care. 2023; 61(Suppl 1):S83-S88. PMC: 9994565. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001808. View

17.

Cunningham C, Patil T, Shahid R, Patel A, Oddie S . Patient-Physician Relational Continuity and Health System Utilization among Patients in Alberta. Healthc Q. 2020; 22(4):13-21. DOI: 10.12927/hcq.2020.26089. View

18.

Hirozawa A, Montez-Rath M, C Johnson E, Solnit S, Drennan M, Katz M . Multivariate Risk Adjustment of Primary Care Patient Panels in a Public Health Setting: A Comparison of Statistical Models. J Ambul Care Manage. 2016; 39(4):333-42. DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000065. View

19.

Arndt B, Tuan W, White J, Schumacher J . Panel workload assessment in US primary care: accounting for non-face-to-face panel management activities. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014; 27(4):530-7. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.04.130236. View

20.

Hay C, Pacey M, Bains N, Ardal S . Understanding the Unattached Population in Ontario: Evidence from the Primary Care Access Survey (PCAS). Healthc Policy. 2011; 6(2):33-47. PMC: 3016634. View