» Articles » PMID: 39403373

Peripheral NK Cell Count Predicts Response and Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients Underwent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2024 Oct 15
PMID 39403373
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The count of lymphocyte subsets in blood can reflect the immune status of the body which is closely related to the tumor immune microenvironment and the efficacy of NAT. This study aims to explore the relationship between peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and the efficacy and prognosis of NAT in breast cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological information and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation counts of patients receiving NAT from January 2015 to November 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the survival probability. The independent predictors of NAT response and survival prognosis were respectively analyzed by multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression, and nomograms were constructed accordingly. The prediction efficiency of three nomograms was validated separately in the training cohort and the testing cohort.

Results: 230 patients were included in the study, consisting of 161 in the training cohort and 69 in the testing cohort. After a median follow-up of 1238 days, patients with higher NK cell value showed higher pCR rates and higher OS and RFS after NAT (all < 0.001). Multivariate analyses suggested NK cell count was an independent predictor of NAT response, OS and RFS. We then built nomograms accordingly and validated the prediction performance in the testing cohort (C index for NAT response: 0.786; for OS: 0.877, for RFS: 0.794).

Conclusion: Peripheral blood NK cell count is a potential predictive marker for BC patients receiving NAT. Nomograms based on it might help predict NAT response and prognosis in BC.

References
1.
Zhu Z, Shen H, Xu J, Fang Z, Wo G, Ma Y . GATA3 mediates doxorubicin resistance by inhibiting CYB5R2-catalyzed iron reduction in breast cancer cells. Drug Resist Updat. 2023; 69:100974. DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2023.100974. View

2.
Das M . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: survival benefit in gastric cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(6):e307. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30321-2. View

3.
Hellmann M, Chaft J, William Jr W, Rusch V, Pisters K, Kalhor N . Pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancers: proposal for the use of major pathological response as a surrogate endpoint. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(1):e42-50. PMC: 4734624. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70334-6. View

4.
Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Darb-Esfahani S, Lederer B, Heppner B, Weber K . Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and prognosis in different subtypes of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of 3771 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 19(1):40-50. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30904-X. View

5.
du Bois A, Baert T, Vergote I . Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(27):2398-2405. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00022. View