» Articles » PMID: 39403129

Obesity May Impair Response to Ovarian Stimulation. A Retrospective Observational Study on Oocyte Quality

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2024 Oct 15
PMID 39403129
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ovulatory dysfunction is more common in women with obesity. Body fat distribution is also crucial because anovulatory women have a greater waist circumference and more abdominal fat than ovulatory women of similar BMI. The primary aim of the present study is to determine whether there is a relationship between BMI and reproductive characteristics, including hormonal values, antral follicle count (AFC), endometrial assessment at transvaginal ultrasound evaluation (TVUS) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), and oocyte retrieval after Ovum Pick-Up (OPU).

Methods: Data from a cohort of 183 patients were analyzed and divided into three groups based on weight status: normal weight, overweight, and obesity. Evaluated reproductive characteristics included: age, basal values of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), 17-beta-estradiol (E2), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), antral-follicle-count (AFC), duration of COS, E2, and progesterone at the last monitoring, TVUS endometrial thickness at the last monitoring before OPU, FOI after OPU. Additionally, the number of meiosis II oocytes retrieved (MII), the total dose of FSH administered, the ratio between MII and total FSH administered, and OSI were registered.

Results: AMH levels were significantly lower in obese patients compared to normal weight and overweight women (1.05 IQR 1.20, 1.58 IQR 2.16, 1.32 IQR 1.38, respectively, -value = 0.032). When looking at the MII/FSH ratio, the normal weight group showed a median value of 3.3 with an IQR of 4.0, the overweight group showed a median value of 2.3 with an IQR of 1.9, and the obese group had a median value of 2.6 with an IQR of 2.8. Those data were statistically significant (-value = 0.049).

Conclusion: These results emphasize the importance of considering weight status in fertility assessment and treatment planning.

Citing Articles

The application of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation protocol in patients with ovarian endometriosis combined with diminished ovarian reserve.

Sun Q, Cao Y, Gu J, Xu Y BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):70.

PMID: 39966753 PMC: 11837442. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03601-w.


Association between combined healthy lifestyles and infertility: a cross-sectional study in US reproductive-aged women.

Ye X, Song X, Zhou S, Chen G, Wang L BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):153.

PMID: 39815248 PMC: 11734407. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21395-2.

References
1.
Willett W, Manson J, Stampfer M, Colditz G, Rosner B, Speizer F . Weight, weight change, and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the 'normal' weight range. JAMA. 1995; 273(6):461-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520300035033. View

2.
Zaadstra B, Seidell J, van Noord P, Te Velde E, Habbema J, Vrieswijk B . Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ. 1993; 306(6876):484-7. PMC: 1676805. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484. View

3.
Huang Z, Willett W, Manson J, Rosner B, Stampfer M, Speizer F . Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in women. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128(2):81-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00001. View

4.
Morimoto A, Rose R, Smith K, Dinh D, Umehara T, Winstanley Y . Granulosa cell metabolism at ovulation correlates with oocyte competence and is disrupted by obesity and aging. Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(9):2053-2066. PMC: 11373349. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae154. View

5.
Yadav V, Malhotra N, Mahey R, Singh N, Kriplani A . Ovarian Sensitivity Index (OSI): Validating the Use of a Marker for Ovarian Responsiveness in IVF. J Reprod Infertil. 2019; 20(2):83-88. PMC: 6486569. View