» Articles » PMID: 39402592

Mid-term Outcomes of Medial Metal Backed and All-polyethylene Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients: a Retrospective Propensity-matched Analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Oct 14
PMID 39402592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This retrospective study compares the outcomes of unicompartmental medial fixed-bearing knee arthroplasty (mUKA), involving a cemented metal-backed (MB) or an all-polyethylene (AP) tibial component, performed in obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 with a follow-up of at least 5 years.

Methods: The institutional database was mined for primary mUKAs involving an MB or an AP tibial component (MB-UKA and AP-UKA groups, respectively) performed from January 2015 to August 2019. Patient demographics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared and a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis (1:1) using multiple variables was conducted.

Results: PSM analysis yielded 37 pairs of obese MB-UKA and AP-UKA patients. At 5 years, the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) was 75.1 ± 10.6 in MB-UKA and 79.4 ± 9.1 in AP-UKA patients (p = 0.029), and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was 38.1 ± 4.4 in MB-UKA and 40.6 ± 5.7 in AP-UKA patients (p = 0.011).

Conclusion: At five-year follow-up, in a matched group of obese MB-UKA and AP-UKA patients, the AP-UKA group achieved better KSFSs and OKSs. Both the AP and the MB tibial components were able to bring about a significant improvement of the most widely used PROMs.

Citing Articles

Obesity and hyperlipidemia were associated with more severe synovitis and structural abnormalities as well as inferior functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective comparative study.

Hao K, Wang J, Niu Y, Wang F J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):845.

PMID: 39696586 PMC: 11657670. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05326-2.

References
1.
Evans A, Paggiosi M, Eastell R, Walsh J . Bone density, microstructure and strength in obese and normal weight men and women in younger and older adulthood. J Bone Miner Res. 2014; 30(5):920-8. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2407. View

2.
Ma M, Song P, Zhang S, Kong X, Chai W . Does robot-assisted surgery reduce leg length discrepancy in total hip replacement? Robot-assisted posterior approach versus direct anterior approach and manual posterior approach: a propensity score-matching study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):445. PMC: 10286345. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03864-9. View

3.
Vasso M, Antoniadis A, Helmy N . Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications and failure modes. EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3(8):442-448. PMC: 6134885. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170060. View

4.
Domb B, Bheem R, Monahan P, Rosinsky P, Maldonado D, Meghpara M . Minimum Five-Year Outcomes of Hip Resurfacing: Propensity-Score Matched Against Total Hip Arthroplasty Control Groups. J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36(6):2012-2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.042. View

5.
Heyse T, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P . Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee. 2011; 19(5):585-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.09.002. View