Beyond Coincidence: An Investigation of the Interplay Between Synchronicity Awareness and the Mindful State

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 Oct 14

PMID 39401263

Authors

Eyal Rosenstreich

Pninit Russo-Netzer

Tamar Icekson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The mindful state is commonly characterized by an elevated awareness of the present moment. An intriguing and rather widespread phenomenon that requires the attention to the present moment is Synchronicity Awareness. This phenomenon refers to the sense of a profound psychological connection between an internal event (e.g., thought, image, or dream) and external events. Whereas mindfulness and its underlying cognitive processes have been well documented, synchronicity awareness, despite its deep roots, has been scarcely examined empirically, and little is known about the cognitive mechanisms underlying it. The present study aimed to further validate the recently developed Synchronicity Awareness and Meaning Detection (SAMD) scale and explore its potential relationship with various mindfulness measures. To this end, 572 participants engaged in an online survey, incorporating the SAMD, Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire, Mindful Awareness and Attention Scale, Langer's Mindfulness Scale, and Encoding Style Questionnaire. The results revealed that synchronicity awareness, meaning detection, and mindfulness are distinct constructs. A significant association between synchronicity and core facets of mindfulness was observed, indicating that participants with higher SAMD scores were more sensitive to inner sensations, more novelty-seeking, and engaged in their actions. Additionally, SAMD scores were linked to internal encoding style, suggesting a top-down processing of experiences. However, synchronicity was not associated with outwards-directed mindful awareness, suggesting that it might involve an intrinsic attentional process, influenced by internal cues. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

References

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

Bohlmeijer E, Ten Klooster P, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer R . Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment. 2011; 18(3):308-20. DOI: 10.1177/1073191111408231. View

Hadash Y, Bernstein A . Behavioral assessment of mindfulness: defining features, organizing framework, and review of emerging methods. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019; 28:229-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.008. View

Russo-Netzer P, Icekson T . An underexplored pathway to life satisfaction: The development and validation of the synchronicity awareness and meaning-detecting scale. Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1053296. PMC: 9885050. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053296. View

Tarrasch R, Margalit-Shalom L, Berger R . Enhancing Visual Perception and Motor Accuracy among School Children through a Mindfulness and Compassion Program. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:281. PMC: 5323376. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00281. View

Rosenstreich E, Ruderman L . Not sensitive, yet less biased: A signal detection theory perspective on mindfulness, attention, and recognition memory. Conscious Cogn. 2016; 43:48-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.007. View

Douglas B, Ewell P, Brauer M . Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0279720. PMC: 10013894. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279720. View

Brown K, Ryan R . The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 84(4):822-48. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822. View

Singer T, Engert V . It matters what you practice: differential training effects on subjective experience, behavior, brain and body in the ReSource Project. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019; 28:151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.005. View

10.

Jensen C, Vangkilde S, Frokjaer V, Hasselbalch S . Mindfulness training affects attention--or is it attentional effort?. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011; 141(1):106-23. DOI: 10.1037/a0024931. View

11.

Zheng D, Berry D, Brown K . Effects of Brief Mindfulness Meditation and Compassion Meditation on Parochial Empathy and Prosocial Behavior Toward Ethnic Out-Group Members. Mindfulness (N Y). 2023; :1-17. PMC: 10040311. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02100-z. View

12.

Heintzelman S, Trent J, King L . Encounters with objective coherence and the experience of meaning in life. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(6):991-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612465878. View

13.

Norman E . Metacognition and Mindfulness: the Role of Fringe Consciousness. Mindfulness (N Y). 2017; 8(1):95-100. PMC: 5241337. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0494-z. View

14.

Baer R . Assessment of mindfulness by self-report. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018; 28:42-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.015. View

15.

Quaglia J, Goodman R, Brown K . Trait Mindfulness Predicts Efficient Top-Down Attention to and Discrimination of Facial Expressions. J Pers. 2015; 84(3):393-404. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12167. View

16.

Bareket-Bojmel L, Shahar G, Margalit M . COVID-19-Related Economic Anxiety Is As High as Health Anxiety: Findings from the USA, the UK, and Israel. Int J Cogn Ther. 2020; 14(3):566-574. PMC: 7258609. DOI: 10.1007/s41811-020-00078-3. View

17.

Levit-Binnun N, Arbel K, Dorjee D . The Mindfulness Map: A Practical Classification Framework of Mindfulness Practices, Associated Intentions, and Experiential Understandings. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:727857. PMC: 8545890. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727857. View

18.

Kerr C, Sacchet M, Lazar S, Moore C, Jones S . Mindfulness starts with the body: somatosensory attention and top-down modulation of cortical alpha rhythms in mindfulness meditation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:12. PMC: 3570934. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00012. View

19.

Chiesa A, Serretti A, Jakobsen J . Mindfulness: top-down or bottom-up emotion regulation strategy?. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012; 33(1):82-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.006. View

20.

Lewicki P, Hill T, Sasaki I . Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989; 118(4):323-37. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.118.4.323. View