Authors' Reply to Correspondence on "direct Potable Reuse and Birth Defects Prevalence in Texas": An Augmented Synthetic Control Method Analysis of Data from a Population-based Birth Defects Registry
Overview
Overview
Journal
Environ Epidemiol
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer
Specialty
Environmental Health
Date
2024 Oct 14
PMID
39399734
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Greenland S, Senn S, Rothman K, Carlin J, Poole C, Goodman S
. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016; 31(4):337-50.
PMC: 4877414.
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3.
View
2.
Arnold R, Saez A, Snyder S, Maeng S, Lee C, Woods G
. Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion. Rev Environ Health. 2012; 27(4):197-206.
DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2012-0027.
View
3.
Colman J, Rice G, Wright J, Hunter 3rd E, Teuschler L, Lipscomb J
. Identification of developmentally toxic drinking water disinfection byproducts and evaluation of data relevant to mode of action. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011; 254(2):100-26.
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.02.002.
View
4.
Soller J, Eftim S, Nappier S
. Comparison of Predicted Microbiological Human Health Risks Associated with de Facto, Indirect, and Direct Potable Water Reuse. Environ Sci Technol. 2019; 53(22):13382-13389.
PMC: 7155932.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02002.
View
5.
Brender J, Weyer P
. Agricultural Compounds in Water and Birth Defects. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2016; 3(2):144-52.
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-016-0085-0.
View