» Articles » PMID: 39399403

Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Type 1 Diabetes Outpatient Care

Overview
Journal Hippokratia
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Oct 14
PMID 39399403
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: A cross-sectional study of adults with T1DM was conducted in the outpatient Endocrinology department between October 2022 and May 2023. Clinical, demographic, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were collected. Three PROMs were applied: the diabetes psychological adjustment scale (ATT18), the World Health Organization well-being index (WHO-5), and the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9). Descriptive and bivariate statistical analyses were performed.

Results: We included 56 participants, aged 41.2 ± 14.6 years, 58 % female, and 64 % of medium-high socioeconomic class. The disease duration of the cohort was 21 ± 14.6 years, with 44.6 % on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and 39.3 % presenting microvascular complications. Glycated hemoglobin of the cohort was 8.0 ± 1.4 %, time in range (TIR) 52 ± 22 %, coefficient of variation (CV) 37 ± 8 %, and median time below range (TBR) 2 %. Individuals on CSII had higher TIR (p =0.03). CV was related to TBR (ρ =0.643, p <0.001). The majority had satisfactory psychological adjustment to diabetes (ATT18 ≥60), which correlated directly with WHO-5 (r =0.511, p <0.001) and inversely with depression symptoms (r =-0.676, p <0.001). No relationships were identified between metabolic control and PROMs (p =0.63).

Conclusions: Including PROMs alongside detailed metabolic evaluation allows for individualized decision-making and active patient participation in diabetes management. These results underscore the importance of preventing depression, promoting well-being, and enhancing diabetes psychological adjustment in these patients, aiming to improve their quality of life. HIPPOKRATIA 2024, 28 (1):17-21.

References
1.
El Malahi A, Van Elsen M, Charleer S, Dirinck E, Ledeganck K, Keymeulen B . Relationship Between Time in Range, Glycemic Variability, HbA1c, and Complications in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 107(2):e570-e581. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab688. View

2.
Hajos T, Pouwer F, Skovlund S, den Oudsten B, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Tack C . Psychometric and screening properties of the WHO-5 well-being index in adult outpatients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012; 30(2):e63-9. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12040. View

3.
Topp C, Ostergaard S, Sondergaard S, Bech P . The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015; 84(3):167-76. DOI: 10.1159/000376585. View

4.
Vigersky R, McMahon C . The Relationship of Hemoglobin A1C to Time-in-Range in Patients with Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018; 21(2):81-85. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0310. View

5.
ElSayed N, Aleppo G, Aroda V, Bannuru R, Brown F, Bruemmer D . 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2022; 46(Suppl 1):S97-S110. PMC: 9810469. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-S006. View