» Articles » PMID: 39399389

Implementing the Robson Classification for Caesarean Sections in Pakistan: Experience, Challenges, and Lessons Learned

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 14
PMID 39399389
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Robson Classification System is recognised as a first step for optimising the use of caesarean section and as a strategy for continuous quality improvement in maternal and newborn health. This Viewpoint provides a detailed account of the strategy adopted and lessons learned from a collaborative initiative to institutionalise the Robson Classification into Pakistan's health system. We developed a training package which emphasised capacity building of senior clinicians to act as master trainers. We also developed a mobile application for data collection and analysis. Training workshops took place in 2020 in a selection of public sector, tertiary-level, teaching hospitals from across the country and data was collected on all births in participating hospitals' obstetric units for a full year. Pakistan is poised for scale-up with the Robson Classification embedded in 57% of Pakistan's public, tertiary, teaching hospitals. A core group of master trainers is positioned in every province, and a robust dataset is available. However, integration into any health system cannot be thought of as a finite project. It requires government commitment, training and an ongoing process with built-in data quality assurance and feedback to clinicians.

Citing Articles

State-wise variation and inequalities in caesarean delivery rates in India: analysis of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021) data.

Dutta R, Nathani P, Patil P, Ghoshal R, Tuli S, Bakker J Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024; 32:100512.

PMID: 39717057 PMC: 11665369. DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100512.

References
1.
Chamberlain S, Dutt P, Godfrey A, Mitra R, LeFevre A, Scott K . Ten lessons learnt: scaling and transitioning one of the largest mobile health communication programmes in the world to a national government. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(Suppl 5). PMC: 8728354. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005341. View

2.
Betran A, Vindevoghel N, Souza J, Gulmezoglu A, Torloni M . A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e97769. PMC: 4043665. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769. View

3.
Betran A, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni M . Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1358-1368. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5. View

4.
Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang Y . Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2013. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186563. PMC: 5645133. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186563. View

5.
Boatin A, Schlotheuber A, Betran A, Moller A, Barros A, Boerma T . Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ. 2018; 360:k55. PMC: 5782376. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k55. View