» Articles » PMID: 39395935

Validation and Correlation of High-sensitive Troponin I and Troponin T in the Emergency Department

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Oct 12
PMID 39395935
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Troponin elevation is frequently observed in various scenarios in the Emergency Department (ED), yet there is a paucity of studies investigating simultaneously measured high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and troponin I (hs-cTnI) within a diverse cohort in a clinical setting.

Methods: All patients who underwent troponin testing at a single center were eligible for this study. Only patients with simultaneous samples with hs-cTnI (Siemens) and hs-cTnT (Roche) were included, regardless of chief complaint.

Results: Analysis of 1987 samples from 1134 patients showed a significant correlation between hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI (r = 0.86, p < 0.01). Of these samples, 65% exceeded the upper reference limit (URL) for hs-cTnT, and 30% for hs-cTnI with 39% who exhibited elevated hs-cTnT levels alongside normal hs-cTnI levels. The area under the curve (AUC) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for the index visit was 0.80 (95% CI; 0.75-0.85) for hs-cTnT and 0.87 (95% CI; 0.83-0.91) for hs-cTnI. Sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 39% for hs-cTnT, and 80% and 80% for hs-cTnI. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 9.3% and 98.5% for hs-cTnT respectively, corresponding for hs-cTnI was 21.3% and 98.3% respectively. Hazard ratios for 1-year mortality were 1.52 (95% CI; 1.40-1.66) for hs-cTnT and 1.26 (95% CI; 1.18-1.34) for hs-cTnI.

Conclusion: Elevated troponins above the URL were very common in this diverse cohort, particularly for hs-cTnT, which was twice as frequent compared to hs-cTnI, resulting in low specificity and PPV for AMI.

References
1.
Melki D, Lugnegard J, Alfredsson J, Lind S, Eggers K, Lindahl B . Implications of Introducing High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Into Clinical Practice: Data From the SWEDEHEART Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65(16):1655-1664. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.044. View

2.
Park K, Gaze D, Collinson P, Marber M . Cardiac troponins: from myocardial infarction to chronic disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2017; 113(14):1708-1718. PMC: 5852618. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvx183. View

3.
van der Linden N, Wildi K, Twerenbold R, Pickering J, Than M, Cullen L . Combining High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and Cardiac Troponin T in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2018; 138(10):989-999. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032003. View

4.
Espinosa A, Hussain S, Al-Awar A, Jha S, Elmahdy A, Kalani M . Differences between cardiac troponin I vs. T according to the duration of myocardial ischaemia. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023; 12(6):355-363. DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad017. View

5.
Wildi K, Gimenez M, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Jaeger C, Heinzelmann A . Misdiagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Related to Limitations of the Current Regulatory Approach to Define Clinical Decision Values for Cardiac Troponin. Circulation. 2015; 131(23):2032-40. PMC: 4456170. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014129. View