» Articles » PMID: 39394560

Acceptability of a Remotely Delivered Sedentary Behaviour Intervention to Improve Sarcopenia and Maintain Independent Living in Older Adults with Frailty: a Mixed-methods Study

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Oct 11
PMID 39394560
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a leading cause of functional decline, loss of independence, premature mortality, and frailty in older adults. Reducing and breaking up sedentary behaviour is associated with positive sarcopenia and frailty outcomes. This study aimed to explore the acceptability, engagement and experiences of a remotely delivered sedentary behaviour intervention to improve sarcopenia and independent living in older adults with frailty.

Methods: This was a mixed-methods study. In-depth qualitative semi-structed interviews were conducted with a subset (N = 15) of participants with frailty (aged 74 ± 6 years) who had participated in the Frail-LESS (LEss Sitting and Sarcopenia in Frail older adults) intervention aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour. The interviews explored acceptability of the intervention overall and its individual components (a psychoeducation workbook, wrist-worn activity tracker, health coaching, online peer support and tailored feedback on sitting, standing and stepping). Process evaluation questionnaires with closed and scaled questions explored intervention engagement, fidelity and experiences.

Results: Overall acceptability of the intervention was good with most participants perceiving the intervention to have supported them in reducing and/or breaking up their sedentary behaviour. The wrist-worn activity tracker and health coaching appeared to be the most acceptable and useful components, with high levels of engagement. There was attendance at 104 of 150 health coaching sessions offered and 92% of participants reported using the wrist-worn activity tracker. There was a mixed response regarding acceptability of, and engagement with, the psychoeducation workbook, tailored feedback, and online peer support.

Conclusions: The Frail-LESS intervention had good levels of acceptability and engagement for some components. The findings of the study can inform modifications to the intervention to optimise acceptability and engagement in a future definitive randomised controlled trial.

Trial Registration: The trial was registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN17158017).

References
1.
McGowan L, Powell R, French D . Older adults' construal of sedentary behaviour: Implications for reducing sedentary behaviour in older adult populations. J Health Psychol. 2020; 26(12):2186-2199. PMC: 8438784. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320909870. View

2.
Harvey J, Chastin S, Skelton D . How Sedentary are Older People? A Systematic Review of the Amount of Sedentary Behavior. J Aging Phys Act. 2014; 23(3):471-87. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2014-0164. View

3.
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis J . Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):88. PMC: 5267473. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8. View

4.
Bailey D, Kilbride C, Harper J, Victor C, Brierley M, Hewson D . The Frail-LESS (LEss Sitting and Sarcopenia in Frail older adults) intervention to improve sarcopenia and maintain independent living via reductions in prolonged sitting: a randomised controlled feasibility trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):1. PMC: 9823257. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01225-7. View

5.
Sardinha L, Ekelund U, Dos Santos L, Cyrino E, Silva A, Santos D . Breaking-up sedentary time is associated with impairment in activities of daily living. Exp Gerontol. 2015; 72:57-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.09.011. View