Processing of Social Closeness in the Human Brain

Overview

Journal Commun Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Oct 10

PMID 39390210

Authors

Moshe Roseman-Shalem

Robin I M Dunbar

Shahar Arzy

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Healthy social life requires relationships in different levels of personal closeness. Based on ethological, sociological, and psychological evidence, social networks have been divided into five layers, gradually increasing in size and decreasing in personal closeness. Is this division also reflected in brain processing of social networks? During functional MRI, 21 participants compared their personal closeness to different individuals. We examined the brain volume showing differential activation for varying layers of closeness and found that a disproportionately large portion of this volume (80%) exhibited preference for individuals closest to participants, while separate brain regions showed preference for all other layers. Moreover, this bipartition reflected cortical preference for different sizes of physical spaces, as well as distinct subsystems of the default mode network. Our results support a division of the neurocognitive processing of social networks into two patterns depending on personal closeness, reflecting the unique role intimately close individuals play in our social lives.

Citing Articles

Neural correlates of communication modes in medical students using fMRI.

Oprea R, Andersson F, Gissot V, Desmidt T, Siragusa M, Barantin L Brain Imaging Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 39984809 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-025-00985-z.

References

Shah N, Marshall J, Zafiris O, Schwab A, Zilles K, Markowitsch H . The neural correlates of person familiarity. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study with clinical implications. Brain. 2001; 124(Pt 4):804-15. DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.4.804. View

Testard C, Brent L, Andersson J, Chiou K, Negron-Del Valle J, DeCasien A . Social connections predict brain structure in a multidimensional free-ranging primate society. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(15):eabl5794. PMC: 9007502. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl5794. View

Son J, Bhandari A, FeldmanHall O . Cognitive maps of social features enable flexible inference in social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(39). PMC: 8488581. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021699118. View

Huntenburg J, Bazin P, Margulies D . Large-Scale Gradients in Human Cortical Organization. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017; 22(1):21-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.002. View

Arioli M, Cattaneo Z, Ricciardi E, Canessa N . Overlapping and specific neural correlates for empathizing, affective mentalizing, and cognitive mentalizing: A coordinate-based meta-analytic study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(14):4777-4804. PMC: 8410528. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25570. View

Wolbers T, Wiener J . Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:571. PMC: 4121531. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00571. View

Dunbar R . Structural and Cognitive Mechanisms of Group Cohesion in Primates. Behav Brain Sci. 2024; :1-80. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X2400030X. View

Peters-Founshtein G, Peer M, Rein Y, Kahana Merhavi S, Meiner Z, Arzy S . Mental-orientation: A new approach to assessing patients across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Neuropsychology. 2018; 32(6):690-699. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000463. View

Andrews-Hanna J, Reidler J, Sepulcre J, Poulin R, Buckner R . Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network. Neuron. 2010; 65(4):550-62. PMC: 2848443. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005. View

10.

DiNicola L, Braga R, Buckner R . Parallel distributed networks dissociate episodic and social functions within the individual. J Neurophysiol. 2020; 123(3):1144-1179. PMC: 7099479. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00529.2019. View

11.

Park S, Miller D, Nili H, Ranganath C, Boorman E . Map Making: Constructing, Combining, and Inferring on Abstract Cognitive Maps. Neuron. 2020; 107(6):1226-1238.e8. PMC: 7529977. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.030. View

12.

Hayman M, Arzy S . Mental travel in the person domain. J Neurophysiol. 2021; 126(2):464-476. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00695.2020. View

13.

Tavares R, Mendelsohn A, Grossman Y, Williams C, Shapiro M, Trope Y . A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain. Neuron. 2015; 87(1):231-43. PMC: 4662863. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.011. View

14.

Peters-Founshtein G, Gazit L, Naveh T, Domachevsky L, Korczyn A, Bernstine H . Lost in space(s): Multimodal neuroimaging of disorientation along the Alzheimer's disease continuum. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(4):e26623. PMC: 10941506. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26623. View

15.

Gusnard D, Akbudak E, Shulman G, Raichle M . Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(7):4259-64. PMC: 31213. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.071043098. View

16.

Vann S, Aggleton J, Maguire E . What does the retrosplenial cortex do?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(11):792-802. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2733. View

17.

McClelland J, McNaughton B, OReilly R . Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev. 1995; 102(3):419-457. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419. View

18.

Gobbini M, Leibenluft E, Santiago N, Haxby J . Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(4):1628-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.049. View

19.

Sallet J, Mars R, Noonan M, Andersson J, OReilly J, Jbabdi S . Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science. 2011; 334(6056):697-700. DOI: 10.1126/science.1210027. View

20.

Laurita A, Hazan C, Nathan Spreng R . Dissociable patterns of brain activity for mentalizing about known others: a role for attachment. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017; 12(7):1072-1082. PMC: 5490684. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx040. View