Temporal Artery Biopsy in Giant Cell Arteritis: Clinical Perspectives and Histological Patterns

Overview

Journal Front Med (Lausanne)

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Oct 10

PMID 39386746

Authors

Pavlos Stamatis

Carl Turesson

Aladdin J Mohammad

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although its role has been debated, temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of cranial giant cell arteritis (GCA). The specificity of TAB is excellent and the sensitivity, albeit lower, is comparable with other diagnostic modalities used for the diagnosis of GCA. This outpatient procedure has a low rate of complications and is well integrated in the majority of healthcare systems. The length of the specimen, the number of the examined sections and the prolonged use of glucocorticoids before the biopsy may affect the outcome of the TAB as diagnostic tool. The typical histological findings in GCA are often characterized by granulomatous inflammation with infiltration of mononuclear cells with or without the presence of giant cell, varying degrees of external and internal elastic lamina damage and intimal thickening. Overlooking signs of inflammation in the adventitia and in connective tissue surrounding the temporal artery may lead to false negative results. The distinction between healed arteritis and age-related atherosclerosis may be challenging.

References

Rubenstein E, Maldini C, Gonzalez-Chiappe S, Chevret S, Mahr A . Sensitivity of temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019; 59(5):1011-1020. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez385. View

Esteban M, Font C, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Valls-Sole J, Sanmarti R, Cardellach F . Small-vessel vasculitis surrounding a spared temporal artery: clinical and pathological findings in a series of twenty-eight patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44(6):1387-95. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6<1387::AID-ART232>3.0.CO;2-B. View

McDonnell P, Moore G, Miller N, Hutchins G, Green W . Temporal arteritis. A clinicopathologic study. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93(4):518-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33706-0. View

Naumovska M, Sheikh R, Engelsberg K, Blohme J, Hammar B, Malmjso M . Temporal artery biopsies contract upon surgical excision, but do not shrink further during formalin fixation. Scand J Rheumatol. 2020; 49(1):84-86. DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1634220. View

Diamantopoulos A, Haugeberg G, Hetland H, Soldal D, Bie R, Myklebust G . Diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography of temporal arteries and large vessels in giant cell arteritis: a consecutive case series. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013; 66(1):113-9. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22178. View

Hall S, Hunder G . Is temporal artery biopsy prudent?. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984; 59(11):793-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65593-1. View

Butendieck Jr R, Calamia K, Sandin A . A study of temporal artery biopsy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2022; 42(1):159-166. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06371-0. View

Salvarani C, Silingardi M, Ghirarduzzi A, Lo Scocco G, Macchioni P, Bajocchi G . Is duplex ultrasonography useful for the diagnosis of giant-cell arteritis?. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137(4):232-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-4-200208200-00006. View

Chatelain D, Duhaut P, Loire R, Bosshard S, Pellet H, Piette J . Small-vessel vasculitis surrounding an uninflamed temporal artery: a new diagnostic criterion for polymyalgia rheumatica?. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(8):2565-73. DOI: 10.1002/art.23700. View

10.

Pouncey A, Yeldham G, Magan T, Lucenteforte E, Jaffer U, Virgili G . Halo sign on temporal artery ultrasound versus temporal artery biopsy for giant cell arteritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 2:CD013199. PMC: 10848297. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013199.pub2. View

11.

Breuer G, Nesher G, Nesher R . Rate of discordant findings in bilateral temporal artery biopsy to diagnose giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol. 2009; 36(4):794-6. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080792. View

12.

Genereau T, Lortholary O, Pottier M, Michon-Pasturel U, Ponge T, de Wazieres B . Temporal artery biopsy: a diagnostic tool for systemic necrotizing vasculitis. French Vasculitis Study Group. Arthritis Rheum. 2000; 42(12):2674-81. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199912)42:12<2674::AID-ANR25>3.0.CO;2-A. View

13.

Putman M, Gribbons K, Ponte C, Robson J, Suppiah R, Craven A . Clinicopathologic Associations in a Large International Cohort of Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020; 74(6):1013-1018. DOI: 10.1002/acr.24540. View

14.

Hunder G . The early history of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: first descriptions to 1970. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81(8):1071-83. DOI: 10.4065/81.8.1071. View

15.

Oiwa H, Ichimura K, Hosokawa Y, Araki K, Funaki M, Kawashima M . Diagnostic Performance of a Temporal Artery Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis in Japan-A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study. Intern Med. 2019; 58(17):2451-2458. PMC: 6761355. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2788-19. View

16.

Poller D, van Wyk Q, Jeffrey M . The importance of skip lesions in temporal arteritis. J Clin Pathol. 2000; 53(2):137-9. PMC: 1763281. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.53.2.137. View

17.

Mehta K, Eid M, Gangadharan A, Pritchard A, Lin C, Goodney P . The utility of the bilateral temporal artery biopsy for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. J Vasc Surg. 2022; 76(6):1704-1709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.043. View

18.

Salvarani C, Crowson C, OFallon W, Hunder G, Gabriel S . Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51(2):264-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.20227. View

19.

Klein R, Campbell R, Hunder G, Carney J . Skip lesions in temporal arteritis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1976; 51(8):504-10. View

20.

Evangelatos G, Grivas A, Pappa M, Kouna K, Iliopoulos A, Fragoulis G . Cranial giant cell arteritis mimickers: A masquerade to unveil. Autoimmun Rev. 2022; 21(5):103083. DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103083. View