» Articles » PMID: 39384737

The Effectiveness of Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Methotrexate in the Management of Ectopic Pregnancy, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Reprod Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Oct 9
PMID 39384737
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of letrozole alone or in combination with Methotrexate on the management of ectopic pregnancy. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were applied for reporting. The EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies focused on women diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy and managed non-surgically with letrozole alone or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) until April 2024. The success rate, laboratory findings, and complications were analyzed and reported. Meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Out of 129 unique studies obtained, 7 of them were found eligible for final review; of which, 3 were nonrandomized prospective cohort studies, 2 were randomized clinical trials, and 2 study were case studies. In 5 studies letrozole was used as monotherapy. While in another study letrozole was used with MTX. The meta-analysis showed a significantly lower level of β-HCG in the letrozole group compared to MTX, 7 days after initiation of treatment (Fixed effect model, MD = -92.22, 95%CI: [-159.39, -25.04], P = 0.007, I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference in the level of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) between groups (Fixed effect model, MD = 0.18, 95%CI: [-0.09, 0.45], P = 0.20, I2 = 0%). Success rate, platelet count, and level of liver enzymes seemed to be better or similar among patients receiving Letrozole compared to patients receiving Methotrexate. Letrozole exhibits potential as a therapeutic option for ectopic pregnancies; however, further randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish strong evidence.

References
1.
Sivalingam V, Duncan W, Kirk E, Shephard L, Horne A . Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011; 37(4):231-40. PMC: 3213855. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0073. View

2.
Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly J, Job-Spira N . Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(12):3224-30. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3224. View

3.
Garzon S, Lagana A, Pomini P, Raffaelli R, Ghezzi F, Franchi M . Laparoscopic reversible occlusion of uterine arteries and cornuostomy for advanced interstitial pregnancy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018; 28(6):359-362. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1547764. View

4.
Marion L, Meeks G . Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 55(2):376-86. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b. View

5.
Lee R, Dupuis C, Chen B, Smith A, Kim Y . Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy in the emergency setting. Ultrasonography. 2017; 37(1):78-87. PMC: 5769947. DOI: 10.14366/usg.17044. View