» Articles » PMID: 39380898

Migration of Digital Functional Capacity Assessments from Device Resident to Cloud-based Delivery: Development and Convergent Validity

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Oct 9
PMID 39380898
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials are leading to rapid changes in assessment technology, including an expansion of interest in remote delivery. As technology changes, some of the updates include migration to fully cloud-based software and data management, with attendant differences in hardware, response modalities, and modifications in the level of tester engagement. It is rare to see systematic descriptions of the process of migration and upgrading of technology-related assessments. We present comparative data on successive generations of two widely used functional capacity measures, the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) and the Functional Capacity Assessment and Training System (FUNSAT). Four samples of healthy older individuals completed either the original device-resident, computer-administered versions, or cloud-based, tablet-delivered versions of these tasks. For the VRFCAT, performance and correlations with age were similar across versions, although performance was slightly (5 %) faster with iPad delivery. For the FUNSAT, performance and correlations with age and cognitive task scores were generally similar across versions for English Speakers, though there were some differences related to the testing language for the cloud-based version. These results support the feasibility of migrating digital assessments to cloud-based delivery and substantiate fundamental similarity across delivery strategies.

Citing Articles

Utilizing Technology to Enhance the Ecological Validity of Cognitive and Functional Assessments in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art.

Horan W, Moore R, Belanger H, Harvey P Schizophr Bull Open. 2024; 5(1):sgae025.

PMID: 39676763 PMC: 11645460. DOI: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae025.

References
1.
Nahum M, Lee H, Fisher M, Green M, Hooker C, Ventura J . Online Social Cognition Training in Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multi-Site Clinical Trial. Schizophr Bull. 2020; 47(1):108-117. PMC: 7825077. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa085. View

2.
Mausbach B, Harvey P, Goldman S, Jeste D, Patterson T . Development of a brief scale of everyday functioning in persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Bull. 2007; 33(6):1364-72. PMC: 2779885. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbm014. View

3.
Velligan D, Diamond P, Glahn D, Ritch J, Maples N, Castillo D . The reliability and validity of the Test of Adaptive Behavior in Schizophrenia (TABS). Psychiatry Res. 2007; 151(1-2):55-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.10.007. View

4.
Durand D, Strassnig M, Sabbag S, Gould F, Twamley E, Patterson T . Factors influencing self-assessment of cognition and functioning in schizophrenia: implications for treatment studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014; 25(2):185-91. PMC: 4305496. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.07.008. View

5.
Czaja S, Loewenstein D, Sabbag S, Curiel R, Crocco E, Harvey P . A Novel Method for Direct Assessment of Everyday Competence Among Older Adults. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 57(4):1229-1238. PMC: 5610961. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-161183. View