» Articles » PMID: 39374088

Quantitative Flow Ratio Will Supplant Wire-based Physiological Indices: Pros and Cons

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, Qiao S, Matsuo H, Qu X . Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 94(5):693-701. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28283. View

2.
van Nunen L, Zimmermann F, Tonino P, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrom T . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10006):1853-60. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4. View

3.
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G . Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10317):2149-2159. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. View

4.
Neumann F, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning A, Benedetto U . 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018; 40(2):87-165. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. View

5.
Wang L, Travieso A, van der Hoeven N, van Leeuwen M, Janssens G, Mejia-Renteria H . Improved Nonculprit Stenosis Assessment in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using Quantitative Flow Ratio. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 16(14):1828-1830. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.04.045. View