» Articles » PMID: 39372707

Prognostic Study of Inflammatory Markers in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Receiving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Oct 7
PMID 39372707
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Inflammatory markers in the blood have been linked to tumor prognosis, but their specific prognostic significance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is not well established. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in this patient population.

Patients And Methods: A total of 406 non-metastatic NPC patients were included in the study. NLR, PLR, and LMR were stratified according to their average values. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the associations of NLR, PLR, and LMR with PFS and OS.

Results: Patients with NLR > 2.78 had worse PFS (P = 0.008) and OS (P < 0.001); PLR > 162.48 was related to lower PFS (P = 0.018) but not OS (P = 0.29); LMR > 5.05 showed no significant difference in PFS and OS compared to LMR ≤ 5.05 (P values were 0.13 and 0.94, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that NLR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR, 1.674; 95% CI, 1.006-2.784; P = 0.047) and OS (HR, 4.143; 95% CI, 2.111-8.129; P = 0.000), while PLR and LMR did not demonstrate significant associations with PFS and OS.

Conclusion: This study identifies NLR as a novel and independent prognostic indicator for NPC patients receiving IMRT, offering valuable insights that could inform future clinical decision-making. In contrast, PLR and LMR did not demonstrate significant prognostic value in this context.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Internal Carotid Artery Invasion by Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Lien C, Yeh S, Cheng C, Chiang F, Hwang T, Cai B Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941853 PMC: 11816255. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030488.

References
1.
Jiang Y, Huang S, Pan X, Ma J, Zhu X . The prognostic nutritional index represents a novel inflammation-nutrition-based prognostic factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Front Nutr. 2023; 10:1036572. PMC: 9977787. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1036572. View

2.
Hamai Y, Emi M, Ibuki Y, Kurokawa T, Yoshikawa T, Ohsawa M . Ability of Blood Cell Parameters to Predict Clinical Outcomes of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2023; 16:263-273. PMC: 10103711. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S404926. View

3.
Guven D, Stephen B, Sahin T, Cakir I, Aksoy S . Immunotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Laryngoscope. 2023; 134(1):7-17. DOI: 10.1002/lary.30754. View

4.
Arneth B . Tumor Microenvironment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(1). PMC: 7023392. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56010015. View

5.
Propper D, Balkwill F . Harnessing cytokines and chemokines for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022; 19(4):237-253. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00588-9. View