Preoperative Joint Line Convergence Angle As an Indicator of Clinical Outcomes and Accuracy of Alignment Correction After Double-Level Osteotomy

Overview

Journal Orthop J Sports Med

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Oct 7

PMID 39371571

Authors

Shintaro Onishi

Tomoya Iseki

Ryo Kanto

Ryosuke Ukon

Shunichiro Kambara

Shinichi Yoshiya

Toshiya Tachibana

Hiroshi Nakayama

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The relationship between postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes after double-level osteotomy (DLO) has not been clarified.

Purpose: To examine the radiological and clinical outcomes after DLO and specifically evaluate the influence of the joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) on the accuracy of alignment correction and surgical outcomes.

Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Included were 74 knees in 51 patients (mean age, 61.0 years) who underwent DLO for varus osteoarthritic knees and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The target hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) for the intended limb alignment was set to 1° valgus. The lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, JLCA, and HKAA were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Outliers in alignment correction were defined as a deviation of ≥3° from the originally intended HKAA. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). In the data analysis, the influence of the radiological parameters on the postoperative outcomes was statistically assessed.

Results: Radiological and clinical evaluation at 2-year follow-up showed significant improvement from preoperative values ( < .001). The HKAA was corrected from 13.4°± 3.0° varus preoperatively to 0.5°± 2.8° varus at 2 years, indicating a slight undercorrection. Regarding clinical outcomes, significant pre- to postoperative improvement was found on the KOOS (from 185.0 ± 71.2 to 387.9 ± 70.5; < .001). Overall, 22 of the 74 knees (29.7%) were deemed to be outliers at the 2-year follow-up (19 knees [25.7%] in undercorrection, 3 knees [4.1%] in overcorrection). Postoperative KOOS values were significantly worse in the outliers than in the nonoutliers (344.4 ± 77.7 vs 405.8 ± 59.3; < .001), and both pre- and postoperative JLCA was significantly larger in the outlier group. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated a preoperative cutoff JLCA of 6.0° for predicting postoperative alignment outliers.

Conclusion: A preoperative JLCA of ≥6° was found to be a significant prognostic factor affecting the radiological and clinical outcomes after DLO for varus osteoarthritic knees by compromising the accuracy of deformity correction, resulting in suboptimal postoperative alignment.

References

Lee D, Park S, Park H, Han S . Effect of soft tissue laxity of the knee joint on limb alignment correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 24(12):3704-3712. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3682-9. View

Na Y, Lee B, Choi J, Lee B, Sim J . Change of joint-line convergence angle should be considered for accurate alignment correction in high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021; 33(1):4. PMC: 7798206. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-020-00076-x. View

Grasso F, Martz P, Micicoi G, Khakha R, Kley K, Hanak L . Double level knee osteotomy using patient-specific cutting guides is accurate and provides satisfactory clinical results: a prospective analysis of a cohort of twenty-two continuous patients. Int Orthop. 2021; 46(3):473-479. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05194-z. View

Takagawa S, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, Oishi T, Tsuji M, Inaba Y . Preoperative soft tissue laxity around knee was associated with less accurate alignment correction after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 28(9):3022-3030. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05762-2. View

Kuwashima U, Yonekura A, Itoh M, Itou J, Okazaki K . Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy - indications and technique. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1):30. PMC: 7221090. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00247-5. View

Hasegawa M, Naito Y, Tone S, Sudo A . High rates of outliers in computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy with excellent mid-term outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 31(2):399-405. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06788-1. View

Behrendt P, Akoto R, Bartels I, Thurig G, Fahlbusch H, Korthaus A . Preoperative joint line convergence angle correction is a key factor in optimising accuracy in varus knee correction osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 31(4):1583-1592. PMC: 10049955. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07092-2. View

Otsuki S, Ikeda K, Ishitani T, Okamoto Y, Wakama H, Matsuyama J . Impact of the Weightbearing Line on Cartilage Regeneration of the Medial Knee Compartment after Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy, Based on Second-Look Arthroscopy. Cartilage. 2022; 13(4):87-93. PMC: 9924979. DOI: 10.1177/19476035221137724. View

Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S . The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979; 10(3):585-608. View

10.

Micicoi G, Khakha R, Kley K, Wilson A, Cerciello S, Ollivier M . Managing intra-articular deformity in high Tibial osteotomy: a narrative review. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1):65. PMC: 7481321. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00283-1. View

11.

Kim J, Lim J, Choi H, Jeong H, Park S, Shim S . Excessively Increased Joint-Line Obliquity After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Is Associated With Inferior Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes: What Is Permissible Joint-Line Obliquity. Arthroscopy. 2021; 38(6):1904-1915. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.004. View

12.

Sohn S, Koh I, Kim M, In Y . Risk factors and preventive strategy for excessive coronal inclination of tibial plateau following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 142(4):561-569. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03660-8. View

13.

Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, Iwai S, Fujita K, Yamamuro Y . Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Normal and Overcorrected Medial Proximal Tibial Angle Groups After Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2019; 35(10):2898-2908.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.04.030. View

14.

So S, Lee S, Jung E, Kim J, Wang J . Difference in joint line convergence angle between the supine and standing positions is the most important predictive factor of coronal correction error after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 28(5):1516-1525. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05555-7. View

15.

Nakayama H, Schroter S, Yamamoto C, Iseki T, Kanto R, Kurosaka K . Large correction in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with resultant joint-line obliquity induces excessive shear stress on the articular cartilage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(6):1873-1878. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4680-x. View

16.

Ogata K, Yoshii I, Kawamura H, Miura H, Arizono T, Sugioka Y . Standing radiographs cannot determine the correction in high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(6):927-31. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B6.1955438. View

17.

van der Woude J, Spruijt S, van Ginneken B, van Heerwaarden R . Distal femoral valgus osteotomy: bone healing time in single plane and biplanar technique. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016; 11(3):177-186. PMC: 5069204. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-016-0266-2. View

18.

COVENTRY M, Ilstrup D, Wallrichs S . Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(2):196-201. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199302000-00006. View

19.

Tardy N, Steltzlen C, Bouguennec N, Cartier J, Mertl P, Batailler C . Is patient-specific instrumentation more precise than conventional techniques and navigation in achieving planned correction in high tibial osteotomy?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(8S):S231-S236. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.08.009. View

20.

Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner J . Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11(3):132-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-002-0334-7. View