» Articles » PMID: 39367998

Adverse Event Profile of First-line Drugs for Treating Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Neonates: A Disproportionality Analysis Study of USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Overview
Journal Paediatr Drugs
Specialties Pediatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2024 Oct 5
PMID 39367998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and indomethacin are widely used as first-line drugs for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure in preterm neonates. However, their relative safety profiles remain unclear.

Methods: Adverse event reports related to the first-line drugs used in PDA and neonates in general were retrieved from the US Food and Drug Authority (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System. Deduplicated reports were analyzed using proportional reporting ratios and reporting odds ratios to identify disproportionality safety signals between drugs.

Results: A total of 969 unique reports related to the first-line drugs used in PDA and 499 reports in the neonatal period were included. Acetaminophen signals primarily involved the liver, while ibuprofen and indomethacin signals pertained to gastrointestinal, renal, vascular, and mortality outcomes. Higher occurrences of death were reported with indomethacin and ibuprofen compared with acetaminophen.

Conclusion: This first comparison of PDA drug safety profiles from spontaneous reports highlights some differences, with acetaminophen potentially conferring a safer adverse effect profile overall. While limitations include missing data and reporting biases, the signals warrant further validation. Given its comparable efficacy to ibuprofen, as demonstrated in other studies, acetaminophen has the potential to be preferred as an initial medical therapy for PDA.

Citing Articles

Hemorrhage risk associated with triple antithrombotic therapy: a focused real-world pharmacovigilance disproportional analysis study.

Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):180.

PMID: 40087557 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04510-4.


Drug-associated gingival disorders: a retrospective pharmacovigilance assessment using disproportionality analysis.

Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G BDJ Open. 2025; 11(1):24.

PMID: 40069171 PMC: 11897221. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00291-8.

References
1.
Sellmer A, Bjerre J, Schmidt M, McNamara P, Hjortdal V, Host B . Morbidity and mortality in preterm neonates with patent ductus arteriosus on day 3. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98(6):F505-10. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303816. View

2.
Backes C, Hill K, Shelton E, Slaughter J, Lewis T, Weisz D . Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Contemporary Perspective for the Pediatric and Adult Cardiac Care Provider. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(17):e025784. PMC: 9496432. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025784. View

3.
Park J, Yoon S, Han J, Song I, Lim J, Shin J . Patent ductus arteriosus treatment trends and associated morbidities in neonates. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10689. PMC: 8139968. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89868-z. View

4.
Eursiriwan S, Okascharoen C, Vallibhakara S, Pattanaprateep O, Numthavaj P, Attia J . Comparison of Various Pharmacologic Agents in the Management of Hemodynamically Significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm: A Network Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis. Biomed Hub. 2022; 7(3):125-145. PMC: 9710462. DOI: 10.1159/000526318. View

5.
Marconi E, Bettiol A, Ambrosio G, Perduca V, Vannacci A, Troiani S . Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for patent ductus arteriosus closure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies. Pharmacol Res. 2019; 148:104418. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104418. View