» Articles » PMID: 39367935

Examining the Combined Benefits of Photobiomodulation and Apigenin for the Treatment of Asthenozoospermia: An Innovative Therapeutic Strategy

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Biology
Chemistry
Date 2024 Oct 5
PMID 39367935
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals suffering from asthenospermia, an infertility disorder, have reduced sperm motility. This study's goal was to identify the impacts of diverse photobiomodulation procedures on the motility of sperm in vitro in patients with asthenospermia, either in isolation or in combination with Apigenin. At 633 nm and 808 nm, the lasers are used with multiple dose values (0.6, 1.2, and 2.4) J/cm and altering Apigenin concentrations (5, 10, 25, and 50 μM). All of the photobiomodulation procedures were assessed. Assessing factors were the DNA fragmentation index, sperm viability, as well as progressive sperm motility. The progressive sperm motility results for 633 nm and 808 nm show a significant increase over 633 nm + 808 nm after 60 min after irradiation. Sperm motility increased more quickly under the 808 nm procedure than under the other procedures (p < 0.02). The observation of progressive sperm motility indicated that a 10 μM concentration of Apigenin created higher results than other concentrations (p < 0.01). Apigenin with 808 nm at 1.2 J/cm resulted in better sperm motility (p < 0.01) and decreased DNA fragmentation index. There was a notable increase (p < 0.05) in the DNA fragmentation index with the 633 nm + 808 nm procedure. At a 10 μM concentration of Apigenin, the DNA fragmentation index was lower than at a 50 μM concentration (p < 0.02). Neither Apigenin nor photobiomodulation significantly decreased sperm viability. The study suggests that asthenozoospermia patients may benefit from apigenin utilized alongside photobiomodulation, while further investigation is required.

Citing Articles

Illuminating the path: the role of photodynamic therapy in comprehensive periodontal treatment.

Al-Timimi Z Ir J Med Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 40029532 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-025-03924-5.

References
1.
Nallella K, Sharma R, Aziz N, Agarwal A . Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(3):629-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024. View

2.
Yeste M, Bonet S, Rodriguez-Gil J, Rivera Del Alamo M . Evaluation of sperm motility with CASA-Mot: which factors may influence our measurements?. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018; 30(6):789-798. DOI: 10.1071/RD17475. View

3.
Pereira R, Sa R, Barros A, Sousa M . Major regulatory mechanisms involved in sperm motility. Asian J Androl. 2015; 19(1):5-14. PMC: 5227674. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.167716. View

4.
Ortega C, Verheyen G, Raick D, Camus M, Devroey P, Tournaye H . Absolute asthenozoospermia and ICSI: what are the options?. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(5):684-92. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr018. View

5.
Curi S, Ariagno J, Chenlo P, Mendeluk G, Pugliese M, Sardi Segovia L . Asthenozoospermia: analysis of a large population. Arch Androl. 2003; 49(5):343-9. DOI: 10.1080/01485010390219656. View